Title: Aid, Agency, and the Malleability of International Law
Description: Why do states tolerate large numbers of refugees? This dissertation offers an answer to this puzzle by examining changes in policy responses by the international community toward Iraqis displaced after the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. From 2003-2006, Jordan, Syria, and Egypt remained quiet about the growing humanitarian need of Iraqis displaced within their borders. From 2007-2010, these countries abruptly shifted policy to claim that millions of Iraqis were present within their borders, and to allow Iraqis greater access to public services and humanitarian assistance. I argue that this policy shift occurred because of new opportunities to extract strategic rents from the international community in the form of foreign aid and development assistance tied to the presence of refugees. I also explain how and why the UN Refugee Agency facilitated host country behavior during these two time periods, at times in contradiction with its mandate under international law. I ground my argument in more than 100 interviews with UN Agency officials, NGO workers, government officials, and Iraqi refugees conducted in Jordan, Syria, and Egypt and at the UN Refugee Agency Headquarters in Geneva between 2007 and 2010 as well as archival research in Jordanian and Egyptian newspaper archives and at the UN Refugee Agency Headquarters.