Title: Att aka snalskjuts ar icke hederligt
Description: Written in Swedish with an English summary.
TITLE IN ENGLISH: "Free-riding is Dishonest": The Swedish Farmers' Organizational Process, 1880-1947
ABSTRACT: 
In the 1930s and 1940s a new organizational structure developed in the Swedish agricultural sector. The farmers' cooperatives, united in Sveriges Lantbruksförbund, grew rapidly and reached a position of near-monopoly in several lines of business. At the same time the new farmers' union Riksförbundet Landsbygdens Folk (RLF) organized a large share of the farmers. After the end of World War II, the collaboration between the two organizations became very close, a development that culminated in 1971 when they merged as Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund.. 
This thesis investigates how these organizations could become so successful, while other attempts of organizing Swedish farmers failed. The organizational process is charted from the 1880s, when the first cooperatives appeared, to 1947 when the process was almost completed. The literature on collective action and social movements provides the guidelines. A central concept is the free-rider dilemma and its different implications for cooperatives and farmers' unions, another is  the different organizations' capability of creating a collective identity. The varying resources of large and small farmers is also an important factor of explanation.
The first empirical section of the book deals with the period 1880-1920, when the most successful new organizations were cooperative associations, especially dairies. These early cooperatives became the base for the organizational efforts that began in 1929, when the dominating problems were overproduction and falling prices. The aim of the agricultural organizations was price control on the home market and to achieve this they had to enlist the majority of the farmers. By 1945, the market shares of the dairy and livestock organizations had reached 95 and 70 per cent respectively and nearly all Swedish farmers had become members. The cooperative movement had valuable incentives to offer, but it was also helped by favourable legislation that forced many private alternatives to disappear.
The RLF on the other hand suffered from free-rider tendencies. The organization therefore decided to help the cooperatives to recruit members and at the same time create a tight connection between cooperatives and union at the local level. Free-riders were condemned and boycott actions were used against fellow farmers who refused to join the organizations. Despite this, membership figures for the RLF grew relatively slowly until World War II, when the organization was established as advocate for the agricultural interest in price negotiations with the government. With recurrent veiled threats of delivery strikes and production cuts, the RLF succeeded in raising prices on agricultural products. The farmers' union could now show that it accomplished concrete economic results. The local branches carried through intense recruiting campaigns and membership figures rose quickly.
The RLF was challenged by the smallholders' union Småbrukarnas Riksförbund (SR), founded in 1938. This competitor was fiercely resisted by the RLF and never managed to recruite many members. As a side-effect of the price negotiations the SR was further marginalized, because the government wanted to deal only with the most representative organizations.

Key words: agrarian history, cooperatives, farmers' unions, smallholders, dairies, social movements, collective identity, free-rider.
Subjects: Cooperative Agriculture, History