OBSERVATION OF THE EFFECTS OF THERMAL BIOFEEDBACK ASSISTED BY AUTOGENIC RELAXATION IN PATIENTS WITH BORDERLINE OR MILD HYPERTENSION (BIOFEEDBACK).
Contributors: Boston University.
Published: 1994
Number of pages: 156
Subjects: Education, Curriculum and Instruction.; Education, Health.; Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: The effect of thermal biofeedback on blood pressure was studied in seven subjects with borderline or mild hypertension using a simplified hand-warming technique, assisted by autogenic training for relaxation by listening to a tape describing relaxation phrases aimed at facilitating the hand-warming process. Five men and two women, age 26 to 64, were enrolled in the study which spanned a period of 18 weeks (pre-treatment period: 3 weeks, treatment period: 10 weeks, and post-treatment period: 5 weeks). The subjects were not on anti-hypertensive drugs, and not associated with other common variables which might have influenced the changes of blood pressure. The mean baseline blood pressure of the group was 142.3/91.1 mmHg for clinic sessions, and 140.0/88.1 mmHg for home sessions. At the end point of the treatment, there was a reduction of 10.6 mmHg for clinic systolic blood pressure, 8.0 mmHg for clinic diastolic blood pressure, 6.9 mmHg for home systolic blood pressure, and 4.1 mmHg for home diastolic blood pressure. The blood pressure responses to the biofeedback treatment varied widely among the subjects. Statistical analyses revealed that significant reduction of home systolic blood pressure was noted in five subjects, and a fall of home diastolic blood pressure in six subjects. Consistency in successful temperature rise and intra-session blood pressure reduction was a good indicator for successful treatment outcome. There was some relationship between the temperature changes and systolic blood pressure changes (clinic sessions, r = 0.6916; home sessions, r = 0.7204). The correlation between the temperature changes and diastolic blood pressure changes was poor, and indeed had a negative trend (clinic sessions, r = $-$0.1754; home sessions, r = $-$0.4084). The effect of thermal biofeedback was maintained during short-term follow-up. It remains to be determined if this technique has a long-term sustained effect.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-03, Section: A, page: 0455.

Thesis (ED.D.)--BOSTON UNIVERSITY, 1994.

School code: 0017.