Iraq and Afghanistan
Subtitle: DOD, State, and USAID face continued challenges in tracking contracts, assistance instruments, and associated personnel : report to congressional committees
Contributors: Hutton, John P.
Publisher: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office
Published: 2010
Place of publication: Washington, D.C.]
Language: eng
Format: [electronic resource] :
Number of pages: 67
Subjects: Management; Evaluation; Public contracts; Defense contracts; Government contractors; Interagency coordination; United States. Department of Defense; United States; United States. Agency for International Development; United States. Department of State
Other titles: Iraq and Afghanistan :; DOD, State, and USAID face continued challenges in tracking contracts, assistance instruments, and associated personnel
Description: The Departments of Defense (DOD) and State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) have relied extensively on contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements for a wide range of services in Afghanistan and Iraq. However, as GAO previously reported, the agencies have faced challenges in obtaining sufficient information to manage these contracts and assistance instruments. As part of our third review under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, as amended, GAO assessed the implementation of the Synchronized Predeployment and Operational Tracker (SPOT) and data reported by the three agencies for Afghanistan and Iraq for FY 2009 and the first half of FY 2010 on the (1) number of contractor and assistance personnel, including those providing security; (2) number of personnel killed or wounded; and (3) number and value of contracts and assistance instruments and extent of competition for new awards. GAO compared agency data to other available sources to assess reliability. In response to GAO's 2009 report, DOD, State, and USAID did not agree with the recommendation to develop a plan for implementing SPOT because they felt ongoing coordination efforts were sufficient. GAO continues to believe a plan is needed to correct SPOT's shortcomings and is not making any new recommendations.
Notes: Title from title screen (GAO, viewed Oct. 2, 2010).

"October 2010."

"GAO-11-1."

Includes bibliographical references.