Objections at trial
By: Myron H. Bright, Ronald L. Carlson, Edward J. Imwinkelried.
Contributors: Carlson, Ronald L., 1934-; Imwinkelried, Edward J.
Edition: 5th ed.
Publisher: National Institute for Trial Advocacy
Published: 2008
Place of publication: Louisville, CO
Language: eng
Number of pages: 335
ISBN-13: 9781601560735
Subjects: Objections (Evidence) -- United States; Trial practice -- United States
Table of contents: title: Addressing juror by name; title: Ambiguous; title: Argumentative; title: Assuming facts not in evidence; title: Authentication or identification lacking; title: Bad acts inadmissible; title: Best evidence rule violated; title: Bolstering before impeachment; title: Business record not established; title: Character inadmissible; title: Co-conspirator statement inadmissible; title: Collateral matter; title: Competency not established; title: Computer graphics evidence inadmissible; title: Computer records inadmissible; title: Convictions of crime inadmissible; title: Cross-examination exceeds scope of direct; title: Dead man's statute violated; title: Exhibit foundation lacking: physical evidence; title: Expert testimony improper; title: Foundation lacking: personal knowledge; title: Habit, routine practice improper; title: Harassment; title: Hearsay; title: Hearsay exceptions: declarant's availability immaterial; title: Hearsay exceptions: declarant unavailable; title: Hypothetical question improper; title: Immaterial/irrelevant; title: Impeachment improper; title: Judicial notice improper; title: Judicial questioning improper; title: Leading; title: Liability insurance improper; title: Limited admissibility; title: Misconduct of counsel; title: Misleadingly dissimilar; title: Multiple or compound question; title: Narrative; title: Offers of compromise; title: Opinion rule violated: expert witness; title: Opinion rule violated: lay witness; title: Original writings rule; title: Other acts evidence; title: Parol evidence rule violated; title: Polygraph inadmissible; title: Prejudicial; title: Prior conviction inadmissible; title: Prior inconsistent statement; title: Privileged; title: Qualifications; title: Rape cases, prior conduct; title: Refreshing recollection; title: Rehabilitation improper; title: Relevancy lacking; title: Religion; title: Remedial measures; title: Repetitive; title: Reputation evidence improper; title: Safety measures; title: Scientific evidence and the Daubert and Kumho tire cases; title: Scope of examination; title: Self-serving; title: Sequestration rule violated; title: Settlement negotiations; title: Speculative; title: Stipulated; title: Summaries inadmissible; title: Tainted evidence; title: Unresponsive; title: Vague; title: Witness lying; title: Appendices; title: Making the record; title: Commandments of objections; title: Objections to opening statement and closing argument; title: Federal rules of evidence.