sense of injustice and its pervasiveness
Subtitle: an inquiry into human misery.
Published: 2005
Language: eng
Number of pages: 273
Description: The sense of injustice is not so predominant in Mendelssohn's work. This alternative view of morality, happiness, and human interaction is the basis for a contemporary reflection inspired by Jonathan Lear's and Harry Frankfurt's works; a reflection that aims at countering the effects of the sense of injustice by acknowledging others' necessary and positive contribution to our moral development and happiness.Rousseau suggests in Emile the existence of primitive affections yielding to a sense that arises from the misperception of another person's intention: "the feeling of an alleged injustice." This is the sense of injustice, the key concept for my thesis. Although Rousseau does not define the sense of injustice and elaborate on its nature, he intimates that this sense is a settled disposition to imagine that other people have bad intentions toward me and to feel resentment toward everybody; and that this sense thwarts our moral development.How can the sense of injustice be characterized further? My thesis aims to specify the sense of injustice's nature through an analysis of the role this concept plays in Rousseau's and Kant's conceptions of morality and happiness. Indeed Rousseau's and Kant's conceptions of morality and happiness actually  derive from the sense of injustice. Much can therefore be learned from them on the sense of injustice's nature; and this is the reason I turn to them in this thesis. Rather than starting from scratch, I examine these philosophers' thought so as to develop a "theory" of the sense of injustice.The ideal of self-sufficiency is the sense of injustice's most important effect. My thesis is therefore essentially dedicated to the analysis of this ideal. Rousseau and Kant assume that it is a fact that others want to acquire superiority over us and that we are therefore justified in taking the necessary means to prevent others from acquiring superiority over us. Self-sufficiency is their answer to this problem. I believe, however, that the tendency to perceive bad intentions explains why we think others want to acquire superiority over us and attempt, in turn, to gain superiority over others or keep others at a distance.
Notes: Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto, 2005.

Electronic version licensed for access by U. of T. users.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: A, page: 2244.