COST AND THE QUALITY OF CARE IN THE NURSING HOME (MEDICAID, PROFITS, OWNERSHIP, CASE-MIX, SKILLED FACILITY, CALIFORNIA).
Contributors: University of California, San Francisco.
Published: 1986
Number of pages: 142
Subjects: Health Sciences, General.; Gerontology.
Description: This study examines quality and cost of care in 29 skilled nursing facilities in Northern California. Its major objective is to examine the relationship between cost and quality of care by using a multivariate approach that focuses on factors which contribute to quality of care and cost. A secondary analysis was performed on two sets of data that describe the same facilities: (1) financial disclosure reports from the state of California, and (2) data from the "Sheltered Care Project" at Stanford University. Three measures for the quality of care were developed using a factor analysis of seven different indices for quality that encompass dimensions of structure, process and outcome. A hierarchical regression analysis was used to identify determinants of cost and quality of care.

Results of the study indicate that quality of care is positively associated with cost and that a reciprocal relationship exists between quality and cost. The proportion of residents on Medi-Cal is inversely related to quality of care. The relationship between profits and quality of care is nonlinear. The quality of care diminishes as profits get higher or losses become greater. Quality of care is positively related to the proportion of residents who are on Medi-Cal in those facilities that don't make a profit. However, it is inversely related to the proportion of residents on Medi-Cal in facilities that do have a positive return on equity.

Surprisingly, the correlation between a less severe case-mix (i.e., fewer needs for services) and cost is positive. This anomaly was interpreted as due to selective admissions policies in the more expensive homes. The major factor which underlies the variation in cost in this sample is the proportion of residents on Medi-Cal and not quality of care nor case-mix. A strong relationship was not found between type of ownership and cost or between type of ownership and quality of care. Ownership has a stronger relationship to cost than it does to quality of care. Profits has a stronger relationship to quality of care than does type of ownership.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 47-04, Section: B, page: 1474.

Thesis (PH.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, 1986.

School code: 0034.