Subversive genes
Subtitle: Restituting identity, family and human rights in Argentina
By: by Lindsay Adams Smith
Published: 2008
Language: eng
Number of pages: 171
Description: This ethnographic dissertation examines DNA identification technologies and their relationship to political, social and familial reconstitution in post-dictatorship Argentina. In the wake of the widespread terror of the 1976-1983 dictatorship, Argentine mothers and grandmothers had the dubious honor of being the first group worldwide to organize around genetic technologies as tools for human rights. This dissertation focuses on these women, who now make up two major human rights groups: one organized around the recovery of their kidnapped grandchildren and the other organized around the identification of the bodies of the 30,000 disappeared. Drawing on rich personal narratives and interviews with scientists and family members affected by violence, I argue that DNA is a particularly powerful human rights technology because it is able to simultaneously work at various levels of social life. I thus focus on three interconnected social spaces--the interpersonal, the familial, and the national--tracing the mutability and movement of DNA quite literally from bodies, to labs, to courtrooms, to international halls of power. By examining the day-to-day reality of human rights advocacy, I document the ways in which DNA technologies figure in that project both discursively, as a powerful metaphor for family and disordered national identity, and practically, as a tool for criminal prosecution and the restitution of identity of both the living and the dead. My research suggests that forensic DNA identification technologies have emerged as core sites of identity formation for individuals and families affected by the terror of the dictatorship as well as for the Argentine nation-state as it tries to reckon with the legacies of repression.

This dissertation contributes to broader questions in the social sciences and humanities chronicling, on a theoretical level, the dialectical relationship between violence, social meaning-making, and scientific process and, on an ethnographic level, how people in the midst of terribly difficult situations make complex ethical decisions about the application and meaning of new technologies. Moreover in focusing on the coproduction of political and scientific orders, this research contributes new perspectives on traditional post-conflict questions about justice, and meaning making and offers an important account of the increasingly central role of science in human rights work.
Notes: "June 2008."

Thesis (Ph.D., Dept. of Anthropology)--Harvard University, 2008.

Includes bibliographical references.