ORGANIZATIONAL SENSE-MAKING BY NURSING JOINT APPOINTEES.
Contributors: University of Virginia.
Published: 1989
Number of pages: 340
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: Joint appointment positions are being used to provide a stronger link between nursing service and nursing education. The first joint appointments were developed over twenty years ago yet little research-based data is available to enhance the profession's understanding of the jobs. The purpose of this study was to provide an increased understanding of the joint appointment position by documenting the sense-making activities of joint appointees in nursing organizations. Two research questions were asked: (1) How do joint appointees make sense of their job? (2) What sense do they make of the joint position?.

A qualitative study was designed to explore the sense-making approaches of joint appointees in nursing organizations. The investigation was comprised of eight case studies of current joint appointees from universities in the southeastern United States which have graduate programs in nursing. Data were collected through three, unstructured interviews with each joint appointee and were content analyzed using an emergent categorization system. The report includes a case study for each respondent and presentation of the results of cross-case analysis. Procedures for ensuring rigor in the investigation included repeated interviews, member checking, peer debriefing, and provision of an audit trail in the final report.

The idiographic nature of each respondent's sense-making is presented in an in-depth case study. Each case report includes a formal definition of the position held by the respondent, a narrative account of the respondent's view of the joint appointment and her sense-making approaches, and commentary by the researcher.

Included in the cross-case analysis is a comparison of the characteristics of the positions and discussion of the commonalities and patterns in the sense-making approaches. Comparison of the jobs illustrates why it has been difficult to develop a system for categorizing joint positions--the differences among them outnumbered the similarities. In contrast, many similarities were noted in the respondents' sense-making approaches. All respondents viewed the joint position as one job, with two or more parts, that spans two organizations. The parts are defined by work settings, not by job functions. Many sense-making approaches were disclosed during the interviews. The approaches highlighted in the cross-case analysis were clustered into four categories: influence of organizational variables on sense-making, temporal aspects of sense-making, approaches for unifying the job, and interactive aspects of sense-making. By using the approaches identified, the respondents were able to understand and bring order to their ambiguous positions.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 50-10, Section: B, page: 4453.

Thesis (PH.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, 1989.

School code: 0246.