Cultural differences in social relevance
Subtitle: does the analytic/holistic distinction apply?
Published: 2004
Language: eng
Number of pages: 27
Description: The alleged contradistinction between the holistic perception of East Asians and the analytic perception of Westerners was examined in relation to the differential relevance of social targets. University of Toronto students of Chinese or Western-European ethnicity viewed single-word responses attributed to three different targets in a word-association exercise. Incidental memory for responses of the primary target and the two non-primary targets was compared across ethnocultural groups to examine the extent to which groups found each target relevant. Holistic perception, as recently discussed by others in relation to culture, would suggest better memory among Chinese than Western-European Canadians for the non-primary targets. This pattern was not found. In fact, there were no overall memory differences across groups. However, women's memory was superior to that of men. Also, Chinese Canadian women showed better memory for targets who shared their ethnicity. These results suggest that cultural patterns of social relevance do not conform to the simple holistic/analytic distinction.
Notes: Adviser:  Romin Tafarodi.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Toronto, 2004.

Electronic version licensed for access by U. of T. users.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-03, page: 1008.

MICR copy on microfiche (1 microfiche).