PATIENT LIFTING TECHNIQUES: A COMPARISON OF BEHAVIORS OF REHABILITATION AND ACUTE CARE REGISTERED NURSES.
Contributors: University of Central Florida.
Published: 1996
Number of pages: 137
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Education, Curriculum and Instruction.; Health Sciences, Education.
Description: This non-experimental study compared the knowledge and performance of lifting behaviors of two groups of registered nurses (RNs) and examined the relationship among a number of variables and lifting behaviors. Using an 18-item performance checklist, rehabilitation RNs (n = 29) and acute care orthopedic and neurology RNs (n = 26) were observed moving a patient up in bed. Subjects completed a knowledge test on body mechanics and lifting techniques and a questionnaire regarding prior training, factors preventing the use of safe techniques, prior lifting injury, and demographics.

The mean lifting score for rehabilitation RNs was 14.93, standard deviation 1.79; mean for acute care RNs was 14.38, standard deviation 1.58. There was no significant difference in the mean lifting scores between groups. Overall, only 46% lowered the bed rails, only 55% adjusted the bed to the optimal working height, and only 55% flexed the knees to lift. A statistically significant difference in mean lifting scores was found between nurses who participated in demonstration and a return demonstration for their most recent lifting training and those who had not had these instructional methods. One third of subjects reported a prior lifting injury. There were no significant relationships between length of time since last training, knowledge test score, prior lifting injury, and lifting score.

Subjects identified carelessness, being rushed, patient mental status, patient weight, inadequate space, and staffing as common factors that prevent the use of safe techniques. Lifting and moving patients was cited by 73% of subjects as the work activity that causes the most musculoskeletal stress.

A sample of rehabilitation (n = 39) and acute care (n = 35) hospitals was surveyed regarding training for body mechanics and patient lifting. Most facilities used a combination of instructional methods. Rehabilitation hospitals reported using the demonstration and return demonstration methods with greater frequency than acute care hospitals. Annual body mechanics review was required by 76% of responding facilities.

Periodic instructional programs in body mechanics and lifting techniques that include a cognitive component as well as learner demonstration of proficiency are recommended. Implications for injury prevention programs and curriculum and instruction for schools of nursing and health care agencies are discussed.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-07, Section: B, page: 4297.

Thesis (ED.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, 1996.

School code: 0705.
Table of contents: class: section