Slippery slope arguments
By: Douglas Walton.
Series: The Clarendon library of logic and philosophy
Publisher: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press
Published: 1992
Place of publication: Oxford [England]; Oxford; New York
Language: eng
Number of pages: 296
Subjects: Fallacies (Logic); Ethics
Description: A 'slippery slope argument' is a kind of argument which warns you that, if you take a first step, you will find yourself caught up in a sequence of consequences from which you will be unable to extricate yourself, and that eventually you will end up speeding ever faster towards some disastrous outcome. Many textbooks on informal logic and critical thinking treat the slippery slope argument as a fallacy. Douglas Walton argues that slippery slope arguments can be used correctly in some cases as a reasonable type of argument to shift a burden of proof in a critical discussion, while in other cases they are used incorrectly. In the four central chapters he identifies and analyses four types of slippery slope argument. In each chapter he presents guidelines that show how each type of slippery slope argument can be used correctly or incorrectly, using over fifty case studies of argumentation on controversial issues. These include abortion, medical research on human embryos, euthanasia, the decriminalization of marijuana, pornography and censorship, and whether or not the burning of the American flag should be banned.
Notes: Includes bibliographical references (p. [283]-287) and index.