USEFULNESS OF FORMAL OBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK: AN EXPLORATION OF MEANING (JOB SATISFACTION).
Contributors: University of Kansas.
Published: 1995
Number of pages: 267
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Speech Communication.; Psychology, Industrial.
Description: Researchers have linked performance feedback to improvements in performance, productivity, job motivation and satisfaction, and other desired outcomes. However, they have noted that (a) feedback does not always produce desired results, (b) little has been confirmed about how feedback improves performance, and (c) scant is understood about the psychological processes involved in the perception, acceptance, interpretation, and use of feedback by recipients. A review of literature revealed the need to examine the usefulness of feedback from the subjective experience of recipients.

Symbolic interactionism provided a methodologic framework from which to approach this research. The purpose of the study was to describe the meaning of performance feedback usefulness for individual feedback recipients receiving formal objective performance feedback in a specified performance feedback situation. The usefulness of two examples of feedback, unit infection control and budget reports, provided to 17 nurse managers on a monthly basis in a hospital setting was explored. The research questions asked what characteristics of the infection control and budget reports make the reports useful or not useful to individual feedback recipients; and what contextual factors, including social, environmental, and personal, affect the usefulness and use of the reports for individual feedback recipients? The research questions were answered using a series of indepth semi-structured interviews and inductive content analysis procedures.

Three general characteristics of assimilation, completeness, and accuracy of report information were generated from 19 more specific characteristics identified by study participants as affecting the usefulness of the two reports. Participants' sense of personal control related to infection control and budgeting; comprehension of and sensitivity to report information; along with organizational expectations, goal presence, information resources, and report operations, influenced report use and usefulness.

Participants expressed a primary need to place report information into some frame of reference to evaluate the positive or negative nature of the report, performance, and outcomes. They additionally sought specific information cues from the reports about why performance was good or poor and what they needed to do next to maintain or improve performance.

A model of report feedback usefulness and tentative theoretical propositions suggesting directions for future research were developed from study findings. Findings support a basic premise of symbolic interactionism suggesting that feedback recipients, as opposed to the feedback message or source, determine the meaning and usefulness of performance feedback.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-12, Section: B, page: 6675.

Thesis (PH.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS, 1995.

School code: 0099.