Challenges to conventional explanations of habitat specificity in migrant birds
By: by Alexander Matthew Mills.
Published: 2006
Language: eng
Number of pages: 277
ISBN-13: 9780494159675
Description: I considered the sufficiency of conventional niche theory as an explanation of breeding habitat specificity in migratory birds. In the field, I used transects, equal-effort sampling, and vegetation analysis in order to study use of space and foraging behaviours in a foliage-gleaning insectivore guild. Using multivariate techniques, I compared patterns among breeding per se, midsummer, and early fall. Habitat specificity and certain foraging traits differed among guild members during breeding, but as the summer progressed those differences declined, a pattern acutely exhibited by Dendroica warblers. Accordingly, habitat specificity in migrant birds is well developed during breeding per se, but it declines during the second part of the period spent in the breeding landscape. Using the same guild, I evaluated a matrix of 27 skeletal measures using principal components analysis. I found that conspecific sexes were commonly less similar morphologically than some heterospecific pairs of the guild, indicating that habitat preferences cannot be accounted for by subtle morphological differences among species. I next considered the biogeography of geographic breeding and winter range sizes for 89 passerine species breeding in North America. I found that latitudinal patterns of landmass availability in the Americas influence relative magnitudes of breeding and winter range sizes, with the latter almost universally smaller than the former. Populations wintering in areas with relatively little landmass appear to be compressed into such areas, strongly suggesting that New World landmass limitations in the latitudes of Central America and the Caribbean influence breeding population sizes. Despite this apparent limitation, breeding territories of migrant birds are commonly clustered. In the field, I broadcast territorial song during the Least Flycatcher spring settlement period and found that such treatments did influence where arriving males displayed, although treatments did not ultimately produce new clusters. I conclude by reviewing sexual selection models and I propose that intersexual behavioural interactions may play a role in the development of breeding habitat specificity, independent of ecological factors. The mechanics of indirect models as well as sexual conflict leading to territorial aggregations could generate sexually selected breeding habitat, by valuing habitat elements as sexual, rather than ecological, commodities.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-07, Section: B, page: 3555.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto, 2006.

Includes bibliographic references.

Electronic version licensed for access by U. of T. users.