Private contractors in conflict zones
Subtitle: the good, the bad, and the strategic impact
By: by T.X. Hammes
Contributors: National Defense University. Center for Strategic Research
Series: Strategic forum -- no. 260; Strategic forum -- no. 260.
Publisher: Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, Center for Strategic Research
Published: 2010
Place of publication: Washington, D.C.]
Language: eng
Format: [electronic resource] :
Number of pages: 16
Subjects: Iraq War, 2003-2011; Government contractors; Afghan War, 2001-; Defense contracts; Military policy
Description: The United States has hired record numbers of contractors to serve in the conflict zones of Iraq and Afghanistan but has not seriously examined their strategic impact. There are clearly advantages to using contractors in conflict zones, but they have three inherent characteristics that have serious negative effects during counterinsurgency operations. We cannot effectively control the quality of the contractors or control their actions, but the population holds us responsible for everything the contractors do, or fail to do. Contractors compete with the host government for a limited pool of qualified personnel and dramatically change local power structures. Contractors reduce the political capital necessary to commit U.S. forces to war, impact the legitimacy of a counterinsurgency effort, and reduce its the perceived morality. These factors attack our nation's critical vulnerability in an irregular war - the political will of the American people.
Notes: Title from title screen (viewed Nov. 1, 2010).

"October 2010."

Includes bibliographical references (p. 14-15).

Mode of access: World Wide Web.

System requirements: Adobe Reader.