ATTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF WEIGHT OUTCOMES (SELF-ESTEEM, EXPECTANCY, PERFORMANCE).
Contributors: University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Published: 1984
Number of pages: 243
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: Overweight is a major problem of Americans. The purpose of this study was to contribute to an understanding of weight control motivation through an attributional analysis of weight outcomes for subjects who weighed what they desired (success) or more than they desired (failure). Data were collected by questionnaire from 260 faculty and staff employees of both sexes in two collegiate settings. The instrument designed by the researcher incorporated Coopersmith's Self-Esteem Inventory and direct measurement of five dimensions: locus, stability, controllability (by self or others, and by self alone), intentionality, and universality. Relationships were tested by regression. Alpha was set at .01.

Personal habits related to food and activity were perceived as the major causes of weight outcomes. Success, but not failure, subjects also viewed inherited or physiological factors as a major cause of their weight outcome. Results suggested that success and failure subjects may evaluate causes differently on important dimensions and that subjects who are overweight according to weight norms may have particularly detrimental patterns. Failure subjects appeared to attribute overweight to their life style and to accept limited responsibility for their overweight.

The study provided some support for propositions regarding relationships between stability and expectancy for future success, and stability and performance (degree of discrepancy between actual and desired weight) for failure subjects. Improved performance was also related to increased intentionality. Subjects showed a tendency to evaluate causes in ways consistent with their self-esteem: Higher self-esteem subjects preferred unstable causes for failure when success was important, controllable causes, and intended causes. Lack of relationships between locus, controllability, and universality and dependent variables suggested that different dimensions may apply in different settings. Intentionality appeared to be a different dimension than controllability. Additional study was recommended regarding the meaning of intentionality, the need to include importance in the prediction of dimensions by self-esteem, and appropriate measurement of controllability. Direct measurement of dimensions was supported from several perspectives. Recommendations included the suggestion that overweight clients be helped to view causes as unstable.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 45-05, Section: B, page: 1428.

Thesis (D.S.N.)--UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM, 1984.

School code: 0005.