Suggestions for evaluating the quality of the Army's science and technology program
Subtitle: the portfolio and its execution
By: John W. Lyons, Richard Chait, and James Ratches
Contributors: Chait, Richard, 1937- author; Ratches, James A., author; National Defense University. Center for Technology and National Security Policy
Series: Defense & technology papers -- no. 99
Publisher: Center for Technology and National Security Policy, National Defense University
Published: 2013
Place of publication: Washington, D.C.]
Language: eng
Number of pages: 19
Subjects: Research; Military research; Evaluation; Laboratories; Management; United States. Army
Description: The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Research and Technology requested that the Center for Technology and National Security Policy (CTNSP) suggest approaches to evaluating the quality of the current U.S. Army Science and Technology (S & T) portfolio and the quality of its execution. This paper contains the results of both studies.
Notes: Title from title screen (viewed February 7, 2013).

"January 2013."

Series from resource home page.

Includes bibliographical references.
Table of contents: title: Introduction; title: The Army S & T portfolio; title: The basics of evaluating the portfolio; title: Evaluating the quality of the program and its execution; title: Summary of report and recommendations.