Additional cost transparency and design criteria needed for National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) projects
By: [Cristina Chaplain]
Contributors: United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration; United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office
Published: 2011
Place of publication: Washington, DC
Language: eng
Format: [electronic resource] /
Number of pages: 11
Subjects: Astronautics; Appropriations and expenditures; Evaluation; Astronautics and state; United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration; United States
Description: "The federal government faces real fiscal limitations and will have to make difficult choices about upcoming priorities. This reality makes it more important than ever that NASA manage its programs and projects as efficiently and effectively as possible and within a budget that over recent years has remained relatively constant. It will also require that NASA make tough decisions about which projects to fund among core missions in science, aeronautics, and human space flight and exploration. Our work over the past three years has shown that NASA's major projects are frequently approved without evidence of a sound business case - ensuring a match between requirements and resources - and, therefore, cost more and take longer to develop than planned. Our March 2011 assessment found that 13 NASA projects that established baselines prior to fiscal year 2009 had experienced an average cost growth of almost 55 percent, with a combined increase in development costs of almost $2.5 billion from their baselines established at their Confirmation Review. While NASA has taken steps over recent years to help improve its acquisition management through several initiatives aimed at improving cost estimating and management oversight, the overall outcomes of these efforts will take time to become apparent. Based on the findings of our past three assessments, we are recommending that NASA (1) provide increased transparency into project costs to the Congress to conduct oversight and ensure earlier accountability and (2) develop a common set of measurable and proven criteria to assess the design stability of projects before proceeding into later phases of development"--P. [1].
Notes: Title from title screen (viewed on Aug. 19, 2011).

Signed: "Cristina Chaplain"--P. 8.

"[report to] The Honorable Charles Bolden, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration"--P. [1].

"March 3, 2011."

"GAO-11-364R."

Includes bibliographical references.

Text documents ([83] p. : col. ill.) as PDF files.

Available online from the U.S. Government Accountability Office Web site (U.S. GAO).

Online version: Mode of access Internet (U.S. Government Accountability Office Web site (U.S. GAO).

System requirements: Internet accessible device; Internet browser, Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF reader.
Table of contents: title: Background; title: Lack of transparency into early project development costs; title: Lack of design metric may contribute to project cost growth; title: Conclusions; title: Recommendations for executive action; title: Agency comments and our evaluation; title: Scope and methodology; title: Appendix: Enclosure: comments from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.