NURSING FACULTY TEACHING IN ASSOCIATE DEGREE PROGRAMS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB SATISFACTION AND INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE.
Contributors: University of Houston.
Published: 1995
Number of pages: 129
Subjects: Education, Higher.; Health Sciences, Nursing.; Health Sciences, Education.
Description: Maintaining adequate faculty is a problem for educational institutions offering nursing programs. The past nursing shortage was caused by a lack of qualified nursing faculty, not a shortage of qualified applicants to nursing programs. The purpose of this descriptive study was to examine job satisfaction of nursing faculty teaching in associate degree programs at community colleges and nursing faculty teaching in associate degree programs at senior institutions. The premise was that if the positive and negative aspects of teaching nursing were known then work towards programs which attract and retain faculty could be initiated. A descriptive study was designed and data were collected by means of an anonymous three part questionnaire. Part I of the questionnaire provided demographic information. Part II contained four open-ended questions and Part III was the Revised Job Descriptive Index (JDI). The JDI measured job satisfaction in six areas: work on present job, present pay, opportunities for promotion, supervision on present job, co-workers, and job in general. Of the 532 full time and part time faculty teaching in associate degree programs at 32 community colleges and 8 senior institutions in Texas, 311 responded (58.5%). On the JDI scales at the p $\le$.05 level of significance, the mean scores showed no differences between faculty at either type of institution. Both faculties scored low in the areas of salary and promotion Logistic Regression Analysis and Analysis of Variance supported these findings and were in agreement with the t-test. While not significant, there was a tendency for community college faculty to be more satisfied with pay than faculty at senior institutions.

Responses to the open ended questions revealed satisfiers to be student contact and clinical supervision, while dissatisfiers were paperwork and committee work.

Based on the findings, it was concluded that faculty at both types of institutions were satisfied with their jobs but felt that improvements could be made in the areas of pay and promotion.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-12, Section: A, page: 4672.

Thesis (ED.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, 1995.

School code: 0087.