CAREGIVER EXPECTATIONS OF FUTURE LEARNING BY THEIR OLDER RETARDED DEPENDENTS.
Contributors: Rush University, College Of Nursing.
Published: 1987
Number of pages: 157
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Psychology, Developmental.; Sociology, Individual and Family Studies.
Description: Attitudes and expectations may have an effect on the development of the mentally retarded. The aim of this study was to examine caregiver expectations of their developmently disabled dependent and caregiver attributions in relation to these expectations.

Primary caregivers (N = 35) of retarded clients were interviewed to determine how they explained their dependent's success or failure and expectations of future learning. The results indicate that the majority of caregiver explanations (76%) adhere to the attributional framework. Most of the respondents (76%) indicated that ability was the most important factor in determining the client's best and worst areas. When asked which of the attributional constructs was the most important in their dependent's success or failure, ability was rarely (11%) chosen. Motivation was the most frequent (39%) response. Caregivers of clients between 21 and 26 years old were more likely to state that the client was not functioning to the best of his or her capacity. Luck was associated with the caregiver believing the client was functioning to the best of capacity, while motivation or the lack thereof was significantly ascribed to those believed to be otherwise (p = 0.033).

Expectations of future learning was measured using selected items from the Woodcock-Johnson Scales of Independent Behavior (SIB) responding instead as 'can do now,' 'might learn to do,' or 'will never learn to do.' Reliability for the PAAQ reached a Cronbach's alpha of 0.991. Validity was demonstrated by a correlation with the SIB long form of 0.745 (p $<$ 0.001). Future learning was significantly predicted by the dependent's chronological and mental ages, as well as the attributional construct the caregiver believed to be most important.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 49-05, Section: B, page: 1619.

Thesis (D.N.SC.)--RUSH UNIVERSITY, COLLEGE OF NURSING, 1987.

School code: 0591.