ATTRIBUTIONS FOR SUCCESS AND FAILURE IN WEIGHT MANAGEMENT: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EXPERT AND ATTRIBUTOR CODING OF FREE-RESPONSE ATTRIBUTIONS BY THE DIMENSIONS OF WEINER'S MODEL (OBESITY).
Contributors: University of Pennsylvania.
Published: 1986
Number of pages: 181
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Health Sciences, Nutrition.
Description: This study was designed to assess the degree of agreement between attributor and expert assignment of success/failure attributions to the causal dimensions of locus of causality, control, and stability. In addition, the relationship between the dimensional coding of these attributions and subjects' future expectations were explored, within the parameters of Weiner's (1979) attributional theory of motivation. The sample consisted of women who participated in a designed weight-loss program. One-half of the sample were current maintenance patients and one-half were classified as drop-outs.

Subjects coded the dimensional properties of their free-response attributions for their present success/failure on the Causal Rating Scale which was designed as a modification of Russell's (1982) Causal Dimension Scale. Two experts coded the attributions, using the guidelines established by Elig and Frieze (1975).

Major findings generally fell into three comparison categories: maintenance versus drop-out, success versus failure, and expert versus attributor. In the maintenance versus drop-out category the most interesting finding was the lack of significant difference between these two groups for any of the research variables, including perception of success/failure.

Success versus failure comparison revealed several interesting findings: (1) present weight was significantly different for these two groups, (2) subjects tended to assign attributions to internal locus of causality, regardless of success/failure perceptions, (3) success and failure subjects tended toward intermediate scoring of the stability dimension, (4) success subjects judged their attributions as significantly more personally controllable, and (5) subjects expected to succeed in the future.

None of the measures (percentage of agreement, kappa, or Ap) demonstrated more than chance agreement between expert and attributor dimensional coding of the attributions. Examination of Pearson correlation of individual scale items and expert coding of dimensions revealed a significant relationship between attributors' personal control and experts' coding of the control dimension. Using stepwise multiple regression, attributors' coding of the locus of causality and control dimensions added significantly to the variance explained.

Discussion of results and suggestions for future research focus on issues of: attributor, perception of success/failure, attributors' meaning of attributions, and dimensional linkages proposed by Weiner (1979).
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 47-04, Section: B, page: 1486.

Thesis (PH.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, 1986.

School code: 0175.