TEAM LEARNING WITHIN NURSE TEAMS IN A HOME CARE ORGANIZATION.
Contributors: Columbia University. Teachers College.
Published: 1996
Number of pages: 357
Subjects: Education, Adult and Continuing.; Health Sciences, Nursing.; Health Sciences, Education.
Description: The purpose of this interpretive case study was to determine whether the team learning model (Dechant, Marsick, & Kasl, 1991), which served as a framework, aptly described team learning as it took place among professional service teams in a home health care environment. The learning effectiveness of two teams, of 12 and 14 home care nurses respectively plus their managers and administrators, was described using observations, document analysis, interviews, a literature review, and the Team Learning Survey (Dechant & Marsick, 1993) to gather data.

Collective problem solving was the major focus of these nursing teams rather than creating new knowledge on behalf of the organization, which was the purpose of business teams studied to create the model. Findings suggest a need to rethink the team learning model with respect to professional service groups even though the basic learning outcomes, processes, and conditions were useful in describing collective professional problem solving.

Key team learning findings were consistent with the model. Team learning outcomes included a strong individual focus, consistent with the professional role of nurses as autonomous practitioners. Team level outcomes related to client care management and common team concerns. Minimal learning was transferred from the team to the organizational level. Two emergent outcome-related findings were not part of the model: emotions and professional nursing behaviors. Both positive and negative emotions were expressed. Professional nursing behaviors focused on responsibility and autonomy which conflicted with organizational productivity requirements.

Both teams used the team learning process of boundary crossing the most. Team and organizational learning conditions findings emphasized the value nurses placed on their teams. Team focus differed: Team I was more concerned with task and Team II with process. At the organizational level team members felt supported by their team managers but felt administrators did not role model collaboration. Modal team learning for both teams was a combination of phases one and two, fragmented (individual) and pooled learning.

Examining team learning provided a basis for suggesting improvements for teaming in changing health care environments. Recommendations were made to the organization and teams studied; Dechant, Marsick, and Kasl; and both adult and nursing education.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-11, Section: A, page: 4622.

Thesis (ED.D.)--COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TEACHERS COLLEGE, 1996.

School code: 0055.