COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LEARNING STYLE AND PREFERENCE FOR COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION IN NURSING EDUCATION (MEDIA, SOFTWARE).
Contributors: State University of New York at Buffalo.
Published: 1986
Number of pages: 264
Subjects: Education, Curriculum and Instruction.
Description: The literature implies a trend towards increasing use of technology in nursing education to individualize instruction and maximize use of human and financial resources. The literature supports the notion that computer-assisted instruction (CAI) expedites transfer of learning and frees up faculty to assist in application and/or enrichment of learning. Most studies related to CAI address effects of alternate teaching strategies and cost effectiveness. Little research addresses the type of person who learns best by CAI.

The purpose of this research was to determine the relationship between learning style and preference for CAI as an instructional modality. The variables of age, type of nursing program (diploma program, associate degree and baccalaureate), national origin, computer experience, and achievement were addressed.

One hundred and eighty-five nursing students enrolled in 11 schools responded to a computer software program and a questionnaire related to demographic data, experience with computers and preference for CAI in various learning conditions. They evaluated the computer program and completed the Canfield Learning Style Inventory.

Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Chi Square, t-tests, and Student Newman Kuels Multiple Comparison Procedures. The results indicated that preference for a particular learning style is related to preference for CAI. The majority of all students indicated a preference for use of CAI in various learning activities.

Findings indicate that the majority of students in this sample demonstrated preference for organization and detail as a condition of learning. The most preferred instructional mode was "hands on experience" and least preferred was reading. Use of CAI was not preferred for "new learning." There was no relationship between age and computer preference. Younger students and B.S. students indicated a greater preference for instructor affiliation. Diploma students had a greater preference for authority and A.D. students indicated a greater preference for detail. Location of the school and computer experience were not related to computer preference.

Findings of this study support the notion that assessment of learning style preference provides the instructional designer with much information regarding the needs and characteristics of specific learners.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 47-06, Section: A, page: 2006.

Thesis (PH.D.)--STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO, 1986.

School code: 0656.