The development of a functional comorbidity index.
Published: 2004
Language: eng
Number of pages: 216
Description: Background. Physical function is an important measure of success of many medical and surgical interventions. Ability to adjust for comorbid disease is essential in health services research and epidemiological studies. Prior comorbidity indices, however, have been developed and designed to predict mortality, administrative outcomes, or for use in specific populations only.Research design. Diagnoses for inclusion in the index were generated through a review of the literature (including prior indices), and focus groups of patients, physicians, nurses, and rehabilitation therapists. The index was developed using two databases: A cross-sectional, simple random sample of Canadian adults and a sample of US adults seeking treatment for spine ailments.Subjects. The mean age of the 9,423 Canadian adults was 62.1 years (range 25--103; +/-SD 13.4) with a mean of 1.68 comorbid illnesses (SD +/- 1.65). The 28,349 US adults had a mean age of 49.0 years (range 18--97; +/-SD 15.3) and a mean of 1.71 (SD +/- 1.87) comorbidities. The databases were significantly different on all key variables including mean age, number of males and females, physical function scores and number of comorbid illnesses (p &lt; 0.001). Measure. The primary outcome measure was the Medical Outcomes Trust Short-Form (SF)-36 physical function (PF) subscale.Results. The Functional Comorbidity Index, an 18-item list of diagnoses, showed stronger association with physical function (model R2 = 0.29) compared with the Charlson (model R2 = 0.18), and Kaplan-Feinstein (model R2 = 0.07) indices. Using a cutoff of 5 points below the mean physical function score as "low function" (SF-36 score &le; 65) the Functional Comorbidity Index correctly classified patients in 77% of cases.Objective. To develop a Functional Comorbidity Index with physical function as an outcome.Conclusions. Many of the diagnoses associated with physical function were different from those associated with mortality. This new index accounted for more of the variance in physical function score when compared to indices designed to predict mortality.
Notes: Adviser:  James G. Wright.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto, 2004.

Electronic version licensed for access by U. of T. users.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-10, Section: B, page: 5051.