NURSING STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR LEARNING ENVIRONMENT, MOOD STATES AND SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE.
Contributors: University of Kentucky.
Published: 1992
Number of pages: 147
Subjects: Education, Educational Psychology.; Health Sciences, Nursing.; Health Sciences, Education.
Description: This study investigated relationships among (nursing) students' perceptions of their mood states, self-efficacy beliefs, and learning environment. Senior prelicensure students (n = 69) enrolled within a baccalaureate program completed a questionnaire composed of four sections: (1) sociodemographic questions, (2) the Profile of Mood States (POMS) developed by McNair, Lorr and Droppleman (1971), (3) the SE measure of self-efficacy belief developed by the investigator, and (4) the LE measure of the learning environment adapted from the College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ) developed by Pace (1984). Three findings emerged from the research questions. A significant relationship (r =.25, p $<$.05) was found between self-efficacy belief and the frequency of student-faculty interactions within the learning environment. This association is not surprising given the technical focus of the self-efficacy measure and the structure of the nursing curriculum. A significant relationship (r =.24, p $<$.05) was found between self-efficacy belief and the mood state of vigor. This relationship corroborates the literature which suggests that individuals who feel happy are likely to feel more competent. In concert with this premise, Bandura's (1977, 1986) theory of self-efficacy belief asserts that negative emotions can undermine self-confidence as negative thoughts can undermine mood. An additional finding supports this assumption in that the mood state of confusion was found to be negatively related (r = $-$.33, p $<$.05) to self-efficacy belief. Finally, the relationship between mood state and the learning environment suggested by the literature was not supported empirically. The possibility that mood and learning environment were both assessed inapproriately is considered. The implications of the results for education and practice are discussed.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 53-10, Section: A, page: 3481.

Thesis (PH.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, 1992.

School code: 0102.