THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG INTELLECTUAL, PSYCHOSOCIAL, AND EGO DEVELOPMENT OF NURSING STUDENTS IN ASSOCIATE, BACCALAUREATE, AND BACCALAUREATE COMPLETION PROGRAMS.
Contributors: University of Texas at Austin.
Published: 1993
Number of pages: 289
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Psychology, Developmental.; Education, Adult and Continuing.
Description: The nursing theory of Modeling and Role-Modeling (Erickson, Tomlin, & Swain, 1988) is based on a concept of client-centered nursing care. The ability to understand and to appreciate the client's perspective is developmentally acquired. This study described the levels of, and the relationships among, three types of development in nursing students: intellectual development (Perry, 1970), ego development (Loevinger, 1970) and psychosocial development (Erikson, 1968). Social desirability bias, age, and education were examined as covariates. The study also considered whether the levels of development varied by type of nursing program: Associate (AS), Baccalaureate (BS) and Registered Nurse (RN-BS).

A convenience sample of 177 nursing students, AS (N = 69), BS (N = 70), and RN-BS (N = 38), from one state participated. Subjects completed the: Measure of Epistemological Reflection (MER), Sentence Completion Test (SCT), Modified Erikson Psychosocial Stage Inventory (MEPSI), and short Form C of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MCSDS).

Ego development assesses development in both cognitive and interpersonal style. In ego development 75% of subjects were at or above the Conscientious stage (I-4). However, in intellectual development 98% of subjects were below the level of Relativistic thinking, (P-5). Intellectual and ego development were correlated (r = 0.26, p =.0005).

In psychosocial development, 75% of subjects were above four on a 5-point scale, indicating high psychosocial strengths (X = 4.4). Psychosocial development did not correlate with intellectual or ego development.

Social desirability bias correlated only with psychosocial development (r = 0.32, p =.0005). Social desirability bias was distributed normally (X = 6, range 0 to 13). Thirty percent had low tendencies toward a social desirability bias (0-4). Age (AS X = 34, BS X = 32, RN-BS X = 36, sd = 7-8, range 19-51) did not correlate with any of the developmental or social desirability variables. Years of education (X = 4, sd = 2-3, range 0-16) correlated only with intellectual development (r = 0.17, p =.02).

Using MANCOVA, the type of nursing program (AS, BS, RN-BS) did not contribute to the variance in intellectual, psychosocial, or ego development, nor in social desirability. Mean scores and standard deviations in psychosocial, intellectual and ego development were similar across all programs. In conclusion, ego development appears to be the more valuable concept for further study of developmental readiness for client-centered nursing care.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-02, Section: B, page: 0371.

Thesis (PH.D.)--THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, 1993.

School code: 0227.