Proof of disputed facts on sentence
By: Law Commission = Te Aka Matua o te Ture.
Series: Report / Law Commission -- 76; Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives of New Zealand -- E 3176.
Publisher: Law Commission
Published: 2001
Place of publication: Wellington, N.Z
Language: eng
Number of pages: 51
Subjects: Sentences (Criminal procedure) -- New Zealand; Sentences (Criminal procedure); Law and fact -- New Zealand; Material facts (Law) -- New Zealand; Judicial process -- New Zealand
Description: At the moment there is no clear procedure which judges can apply when faced with disputed facts. In this report, the Law Commission recommends a simple and comprehensive procedure for judges to follow when presented with disputed facts at sentence.
Notes: "November 2001."

"The Honourable Justice J. Bruce Robertson - President"--T.p. verso.

"NZLC R76"--T.p. verso.

"Also published as Parliamentary paper E 3176"--T.p. verso.

Includes bibliographical references (p. 44-47).

Also available as a PDF file from the publishing body's website.