IMPACT OF STRESS, HARDINESS, HOME AND WORK ENVIRONMENT ON ILLNESS, JOB SATISFACTION, AND ABSENTEEISM IN REGISTERED NURSES.
Contributors: University of Missouri--Kansas City.
Published: 1988
Number of pages: 173
Subjects: Psychology, General.; Psychology, Industrial.; Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship of personality, work and home environment, stress, and demographic variables with illness, job satisfaction, and absenteeism. It was expected that the additive effects of personality and environment would significantly explain the variance in the job stress outcomes of illness, job satisfaction, and absenteeism; this was not found. The participants completed the following instruments: the Work Environment Scale, the Nursing Job Satisfaction Scale, the Personal Views Survey (hardiness), the Comprehensive Scale of Stress Assessment: Global Inventory II, the Seriousness of Illness Rating Scale, a demographic data sheet, and an author-devised instrument measuring Satisfaction with Home Environment. Absenteeism was measured by the Lost Time Rate, a calculation of the ratio of number of hours absent compared to total number of scheduled work hours.

A canonical correlation analysis yielded three statistically significant (p $<$.002) canonical variates. In the first canonical variate, job satisfaction and low rates of reported illness were associated with low levels of stress and a work environment characterized by low work pressure. In the second canonical variate, low rates of absenteeism were related to age, work hours, inexperience, hardy personality, and a work environment characterized as high in work pressure and low in control. In the third canonical variate, illness and job satisfaction were related to work hours, inexperience, number of job changes, hardy personality traits, and a work environment characterized as low in work pressure and high in control. Subsequent multiple regression carried out to calculate partial correlations showed that stress shared the most unique variance with illness, and work pressure shared the most unique variance with job satisfaction. The major conclusions were: (a) Absenteeism is possibly related to avoidance coping. (b) Absenteeism is not highly correlated to illness. (c) Global stress has a significant relationship to illness. (d) A limiting work environment with negative health consequences possibly could be defined with these characteristics: high control, high work pressure, low clarity, and low task orientation.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 50-01, Section: B, page: 0337.

Thesis (PH.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - KANSAS CITY, 1988.

School code: 0134.