Law and objectivity
By: Kent Greenawalt.
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Published: 1992
Place of publication: New York
Language: eng
Number of pages: 288
Subjects: Law -- Interpretation and construction.; Objectivity.
Description: Is law "objective?" Should law be objective? These questions continue to generate argument and confusion. In this book, Kent Greenawalt clarifies the different senses in which law might be objective, and examines claims that it is so.

Greenawalt begins by considering skeptical views about the meaning of language. Inquiring into the language of legal standards and whether it can yield correct answers to legal problems, he explores how the language of authoritative standards can indicate a single correct resolution in some cases, but not in others.

The book's second part considers the ways in which the substance of the law may be more or less objective. One critical problem examined here concerns reliance on "objective" standards of "reasonable people," or standards that rely on particular characteristics of individuals. A second problem is whether standards of law treat various groups fairly.

A third involves appropriate levels of generality for legal standards, and the claim of some feminists that in its abstractness and generality the law is overly "masculine.".

In Part Three, Greenawalt discusses the relation between law and "external" standards of evaluation. He focuses on standards of community morality, economic efficiency, and sound moral and political philosophy, and shows that legal evaluation often includes the use of such standards. Greenawalt goes on to argue that claims stating legal questions always have correct answers must rest on similar claims that questions of moral and political philosophy also have such "objectively" correct answers.

He contends that many of the latter questions do have correct answers, based on best reasons that are generally accessible; extreme skepticism about the law's objectivity is thus unwarranted. He concludes, however, that other questions do not have answers that are correct in this sense; therefore not all legal questions can have correct answers

. An important discussion of fundamental issues in current legal philosophy, Law and Objectivity provides a historical overview that illuminates the development of jurisprudence in the English-speaking world over the last fifty years.
Notes: Includes bibliographical references (p. 275-280) and index.