EMPATHY LEVELS AND COPING PROFILES OF A SELECTED GROUP OF PSYCHIATRIC REGISTERED NURSES.
Contributors: University of Texas at Austin.
Published: 1994
Number of pages: 294
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Health Sciences, Mental Health.; Psychology, Clinical.
Description: The purposes of this study were to obtain information on empathy levels and to determine the relationships between coping methods and selected demographic variables with empathy levels in a sample of psychiatric registered nurses employed in selected mental health care settings. This study was initiated to add to the current theory base of empathy and coping in nursing. Overall goals included applying the essential elements of the works of Rogers and Lazarus as operationalized respectively by La Monica and Jalowiec to this study and to report normative data on psychiatric registered nurse empathy levels.

There were 172 female and 33 male psychiatric registered nurses, aged 20 to 71 or more years, in the convenience sample. Data were obtained by the use of the Empathy Construct Rating Scale (La Monica, 1984), the Jalowiec Coping Scale (Jalowiec, 1987), and a demographic data sheet. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques, Pearson product-moment correlation, and stepwise multiple regression. Two methods were used to calculate empathy scores in order to compare findings with previous studies. They were identified as Empathy 1 scores and Empathy 2 scores.

Findings demonstrated moderately well-developed empathy levels in the psychiatric registered nurse. Results of the analysis showed low positive significant relationships between Empathy 1 scores and confrontive coping methods (p =.0001) and between Empathy 1 scores and optimistic coping methods (p =.0429) and a low inverse significant relationship between Empathy 1 scores and emotive coping methods (p =.0440). Findings also revealed low positive significant relationships between Empathy 2 scores and confrontive coping methods (p =.0000) and between Empathy 2 scores and optimistic coping methods (p =.0250).

Among the coping method and demographic predictor variables, confrontive coping methods, highest educational preparation, working with patients having psychosexual disorders, and type of employee accounted for 16% of the variance in Empathy 1 scores (p =.0000). Confrontive coping methods, highest educational preparation, working with patients having psychosexual disorders, working with patients having psychological factors affecting physical condition disorders, and emotive coping methods accounted for 19% of the variance in Empathy 2 scores (p =.0000). Implications for nursing theory development, practice, education, and research were identified.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-11, Section: B, page: 4788.

Thesis (PH.D.)--THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, 1994.

School code: 0227.