Governance matters IV
Subtitle: governance indicators for 1996-2004, volume 1 of 2
By: Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, Massimo Mastruzzi, Research working paper Collection Title:Policy.
Contributors: Kraay, Aart.; World Bank.
Series: Policy research working paper ;; 3630; Policy research working papers (Online) ;; 3630.
Publisher: World Bank
Published: 2005
Place of publication: [Washington, D.C
Language: eng
Format: Electronic resource
Subjects: Public administration.; Political stability.; Political corruption.; Economic development.
Description: "The authors present the latest update of their aggregate governance indicators, together with new analysis of several issues related to the use of these measures.  The governance indicators measure the following six dimensions of governance: (1) voice and accountability; (2) political instability and violence; (3) government effectiveness; (4) regulatory quality; (5) rule of law, and (6) control of corruption.  They cover 209 countries and territories for 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, and 2004.  They are based on several hundred individual variables measuring perceptions of governance, drawn from 37 separate data sources constructed by 31 organizations.  The authors present estimates of the six dimensions of governance for each period, as well as margins of error capturing the range of likely values for each country.  These margins of error are not unique to perceptions-based measures of governance, but are an important feature of all efforts to measure governance, including objective indicators.  In fact, the authors give examples of how individual objective measures provide an incomplete picture of even the quite particular dimensions of governance that they are intended to measure.  The authors also analyze in detail changes over time in their estimates of governance; provide a framework for assessing the statistical significance of changes in governance; and suggest a simple rule of thumb for identifying statistically significant changes in country governance over time.  The ability to identify significant changes in governance over time is much higher for aggregate indicators than for any individual indicator.  While the authors find that the quality of governance in a number of countries has changed significantly (in both directions), they also provide evidence suggesting that there are no trends, for better or worse, in global averages of governance.  Finally, they interpret the strong observed correlation between income and governance, and argue against recent efforts to apply a discount to governance performance in low-income countries. "--World Bank web site.
Notes: Includes bibliographical references.
Title from PDF file as viewed on 8/22/2005.
Also available in print.
System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.