Comparison of pharmaceutical quality of care for pediatric asthma across Medicaid populations
By: principal investigator: Janet Bronstein
Publisher: University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lister Hill Center for Health Policy
Published: 2000
Place of publication: [Birmingham, AL
Language: eng
Subjects: Economic aspects; Asthma in children; Medicaid; Treatment; Chemotherapy; Evaluation; Drug utilization
Description: This completed project had three goals: (1) To compare children with asthma covered under two different Medicaid programs on the frequency of specific deviations from recommended asthma treatment, and the association of these deviations with health care utilization and expenditures; (2) To assess the accuracy of association of Medicaid claims data for identifying problems in the pharmaceutical treatment of asthma by comparing claims data to medical records data ; and (3) To assess the extent to which a claims-based retrospective Drug Utilization Review (DUR) can decrease unnecessary health care expenditures associated with problems in the pharmaceutical treatment of asthma. The potential impact of a retrospective DUR system was simulated. The project used Medicaid claims data from the States of Alabama and Michigan for CY 1993-1995 to accomplish goals one and three. The validity analysis described in goal two is based on a sample of medical records collected on the basis of and compared to 1995 Alabama Medicaid claims for children with asthma.
Notes: Title from CMS pdf tracking form.

"01 Aug 96 - 30 Jun 00"

Supported by HCFA grant no. 500-96-0013/02.