The search for benchmarks
Subtitle: when do crowds provide wisdom?
By: Charles M.C. Lee, Paul Ma, Charles C.Y. Wang
Contributors: Wang, Charles C.Y, author; Ma, Paul, author; Harvard Business School
Series: Working paper / Harvard Business School -- 15-032; Working paper (Harvard Business School) -- 15-032
Publisher: Harvard Business School
Published: 2014
Place of publication: Boston]
Language: eng
Number of pages: 65
Description: We compare the performance of a comprehensive set of alternative peer identification schemes used in economic benchmarking. Our results show the peer firms identified from aggregation of informed agents' revealed choices in Lee, Ma, and Wang (2014) perform best, followed by peers with the highest overlap in analyst coverage, in explaining cross-sectional variations in base firms' out-of-sample: (a) stock returns, (b) valuation multiples, (c) growth rates, (d) R&D expenditures, (e) leverage, and (f) profitability ratios. Conversely, peers firms identified by Google and Yahoo Finance, as well as product market competitors gleaned from 10-K dis-closures, turned in consistently worse performances. We contextualize these results in a simple model that predicts when information aggregation across heterogeneously informed individuals is likely to lead to improvements in dealing with the problem of economic benchmarking.
Notes: "October 2014" -- Publisher's website.

Includes bibliographical references (pages 36-37).