COGNITIVE, AFFECTIVE, AND BEHAVIORAL DIMENSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH WRITING, AND JOURNAL ARTICLE PRODUCTIVITY OF DOCTORALLY-PREPARED NURSES.
Contributors: University of Nebraska--Lincoln.
Published: 1987
Number of pages: 185
Subjects: Education, Administration.; Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: The purposes of this study were to describe cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions associated with writing among doctorally-prepared nurses, to determine relationships between writing dimensions and journal article publication, and to compare salient dimensions between low and high-producing groups. From a sample of 500 persons listed in either the American Nurses' Association Directory of Nurses with Doctoral Degrees (1984) or the Sigma Theta Tau Directory of Nurse Researchers (1983), 343 usable questionnaires were returned. The 18 independent variables were categorized as follows: (1) cognitive (writer's block, premature editing), (2) affective (writing apprehension), (3) behavioral (writing in seclusion, setting writing goals and rewards for meeting them, writing regularly regardless of mood or inspiration, writing for a particular audience, using a word processor, selecting competent coauthors, using published articles as examples, revising manuscripts multiple times, and having colleagues review manuscripts). The two dependent variables were research and nonresearch articles published in refereed journals in the past three years.

Respondents reported a mean of 2.34 research and 2.25 nonresearch articles published in the preceding three years. Low scores were obtained for writer's block, premature editing, and writing apprehension. Behavioral dimensions performed most often included multiple revisions of manuscripts, writing for a specific audience and obtaining feedback from colleagues. The mean number of hours spent writing per week was 3.2.

Forward inclusion multiple regressions analysis showed that five variables accounted for 18 percent of the variance in research article productivity: time spent writing, a low level of writer's block, not awaiting inspiration, not using writing references, and obtaining feedback from colleagues. Four variables accounted for 12.9 percent of the variance in nonresearch article productivity: time, a low level of writer's block and writing apprehension, and not writing according to a schedule. The highest producers reported lower levels of writer's block and writing apprehension, spent more time writing, awaited inspiration less, and wrote according to a schedule more than the nonproducers.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 48-07, Section: A, page: 1599.

Thesis (PH.D.)--THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN, 1987.

School code: 0138.