An evaluation of judicial case management under the Civil Justice Reform Act
By: James S. Kakalik ... [et al.].
Contributors: Kakalik, James S.; Institute for Civil Justice (U.S.); Judicial Conference of the United States.
Publisher: RAND
Published: 1996
Place of publication: Santa Monica, CA
Language: eng
Number of pages: 349
Subjects: District courts -- United States -- Administration.; Justice, Administration of -- United States -- Evaluation.; Costs (Law) -- United States.; Dispute resolution (Law) -- United States.; Court congestion and delay -- United States.
Description: The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (CJRA) required each federal district court to develop a case management plan to reduce costs and delay. The legislation also created a pilot program to test six principles of case management, and required an independent evaluation to assess their effects. This report is one of four documents describing the evaluation, which was conducted by RAND's Institute for Civil Justice. The report describes the effects of the CJRA case management principles on time to disposition, costs, and participants' satisfaction and views of fairness. The study found that the CJRA's package of case management policies, as implemented, had little effect on any of these outcomes. However, what judges do to manage cases does matter. A package of procedures containing early judicial management, early setting of a trial date, and shorter time to discovery cutoff could reduce time to disposition by 30 percent, with no change in litigation costs, satisfaction, or perceived fairness. See also MR-800-ICJ, MR-801-ICJ, and MR-803-ICJ.
Notes: Includes bibliographical references (p. 321-332).
"Rand Institute for Civil Justice."
"Prepared for the Judicial Conference of the United States"--P. 2 of cover.
"MR-802.0-ICJ"--P. 4 of cover.