supplement to the first and second parts of Lay-baptism invalid
Subtitle: shewing that the heretical and schismatical baptisms which some ancient churches esteem'd to have been valid, were not lay-baptisms, in the opinion of those churches : in answer to the second part of Mr. Bingham's pretended Scholastical history of lay-baptism, and prov'd out of that same book, and the other writings of Mr. Bingham : with a caveat against Dr. White Kennet's dangerous notion of the power of divine grace, and his sophistical rule for judging of doctrines : in his Sermon at the funeral of the Duke of Devonshire, and his Spittal-sermon on Easter-Tuesday, 1714
By: by the author of Lay-baptism invalid. --
Contributors: Laurence, R. 1670-1736.
Publisher: Printed by G. James, for Henry Clements ...
Published: 1714
Place of publication: London
Language: eng
Number of pages: 152
Subjects: Bingham, Joseph, -- 1668-1723.; Kennett, White, -- 1660-1728.; Kennett, White, -- 1660-1728.; Baptism -- Early works to 1800.; Baptists -- Doctrines; Baptists -- Controversial literature
Notes: By Roger Laurence.  Cf. Halkett & Laing.

Includes bibliographical references.