A skeptical appraisal of asset-pricing tests
By: Jonathan Lewellen, Stefan Nagel, Jay Shanken
Contributors: Nagel, Stefan; Shanken, Jay; National Bureau of Economic Research
Series: NBER working paper series -- working paper 12360; Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research : Online) -- working paper no. 12360.
Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research
Published: 2006
Place of publication: Cambridge, MA
Language: eng
Format: [electronic resource] /
Description: "It has become standard practice in the cross-sectional asset-pricing literature to evaluate models based on how well they explain average returns on size- and B/M-sorted portfolios, something many models seem to do remarkably well.  In this paper, we review and critique the empirical methods used in the literature.  We argue that asset-pricing tests are often highly misleading, in the sense that apparently strong explanatory power (high cross-sectional R2s and small pricing errors) in fact provides quite weak support for a model.  We offer a number of suggestions for improving empirical tests and evidence that several proposed models don't work as well as originally advertised"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Notes: Title from PDF file as viewed on 7/20/2006.

Includes bibliographical references.

Also available in print.

System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Mode of access: World Wide Web.