Opportunities for improving the drug development process
Subtitle: results from a survey of industry and the fda
By: Ernst R. Berndt, Adrian H. B. Gottschalk, Matthew W. Strobeck.
Contributors: Gottschalk, Adrian H. B.; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Series: NBER working paper series ;; working paper 11425; Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research : Online) ;; working paper no. 11425.
Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research
Published: 2005
Place of publication: Cambridge, MA
Language: eng
Format: Electronic resource
Subjects: United States. Food and Drug Administration.; Drug development -- United States.; Drugs -- Testing -- Government policy -- United States.
Description: "In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agency is responsible for regulating the safety and efficacy of biopharmaceutical drug products.  Furthermore, the FDA is tasked with speeding new medical innovations to market.  These two missions create an inherent tension within the agency and between the agency and key stakeholders.  Oftentimes, communications and interactions between regulated companies and the FDA suffer.The focus of this research is on the interactions between the FDA and the biopharmaceutical companies that perform drug R&D.  To assess the current issues and state of communication and interaction between the FDA and industry, we carried out a survey of industry leadership in R&D and regulatory positions as well as senior leadership at the FDA who have responsibility for drug evaluation and oversight.Based on forty-nine industry and eight FDA interviews we conducted, we found that industry seeks additional structured and informal interactions with the FDA, especially during Phase II of development.  Overall, industry placed greater value on additional communication than did the FDA.  Furthermore, industry interviewees indicated that they were willing to pay PDUFA-like fees during clinical development to ensure that the FDA could hire additional, well-qualified staff to assist with protocol reviews and decision-making.Based on our survey and discussions, we uncovered several thematic opportunities to improve interactions between the FDA and industry and to reduce clinical development times: 1) develop metrics and goals at the FDA for clinical development times in exchange for PDUFA like fees; 2) establish an oversight board consisting of industry, agency officials, and premier external scientists (possibly at NIH or CDC) to evaluate and audit retrospectively completed and terminated drug projects; and 3) construct a knowledge database that can simultaneously protect proprietary data while allowing sponsor companies to understand safety issues and problems of previously developed/failed drug programs.While profound scientific and medical challenges face the FDA and industry, the first step to reducing development times and associated costs and facilitating innovation is to provide an efficient regulatory process that reduces unnecessary uncertainty and delays due to lack of communication and interaction"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Notes: Includes bibliographical references.
Title from PDF file as viewed on 7/11/2005.
Also available in print.
System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.