PSYCHOSOCIAL VARIABLES: THEIR PREDICTION OF BIRTH COMPLICATIONS AND RELATION TO PERCEPTION OF CHILDBIRTH (LIFE STRESS, SOCIAL SUPPORT, COPING, COMMITMENT).
Contributors: University of Michigan.
Published: 1986
Number of pages: 253
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contribution of five psychosocial variables to the prediction of unexpected birth complications and to examine their relationship to perception of the childbirth experience in a sample controlled for the presence of pre-existing medical and obstetrical risk factors. These variables were: active choice in becoming pregnant, perception of pregnancy, coping resources, perceived life stress, and perceived social support. The House Stress Paradigm and Neuman's Model for Nursing provided the theoretical framework for this prospective correlational study.

A non-probability sample of 197 married, Caucasian women, expecting normal deliveries, was interviewed in the eighth month of pregnancy and in the early postpartum. Subjects had a mean of 28.9 years, 50% were college educated, and 96 were primigravidas.

Established tools (Lederman's Pregnancy Questionnaire and Pearlin and Schooler's Coping Resources Scale) measuring perception of pregnancy and coping were combined with tools developed for this study to measure choice in becoming pregnant, perceived social support, and perceived life stress. Marut and Mercer's Perception of Childbirth Questionnaire was used as a dependent variable. All measures had acceptable reliability ratings.

The rate of birth complications was 42% for the total sample, 26% for multiparas, and 58% for primiparas. Discriminant function analysis indicated that anticipation of labor and delivery (a subscale of perception of pregnancy), controlled for coping resources, and total help were significant predictors of complications, but did not improve upon parity as a predictor. There were no significant interactive effects. The rate of complications increased substantially for primiparas who viewed their pregnancy as worse than expected (68%) or had not actively chosen to become pregnant (77%).

Negative anticipation of labor and delivery, increased stress, and birth complications contributed to a negative perception of birth for primiparas (R('2) = .30, p < .01). Multiparas' perceptions were enhanced by perceived control and friend support and diminished by cesarean birth and problems in labor (R('2) = .24, p = .03).

The findings that pregnancy experiences, the patterns of relationships among prenatal variables, and contributors to perception of birth and outcome differed according to parity suggests avenues for further study as well as clinical assessment. The data collection tools used in this study were judged useful for incorporation within a comprehensive nursing assessment of prenatal clients.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 47-03, Section: B, page: 0997.

Thesis (PH.D.)--THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, 1986.

School code: 0127.