MY FREEDOM, MY LIFE: VOICES OF MORAL CONFLICT, SEPARATIONS, AND CONNECTIONS IN WOMEN WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED ABUSE (DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, BATTERED WOMEN).
Contributors: Wayne State University.
Published: 1996
Number of pages: 218
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Psychology, Developmental.; Women's Studies.; Psychology, Social.; Psychology, Clinical.
Description: The purpose of this study was to discern decisions experienced as moral conflict by women who have experienced abuse by an intimate partner, specifically explicating the conflicts between self and other. Eighteen women (Anglo, 11; Hispanic, 5; African American, 2) participated in the study. Utilizing a self-in-relation perspective of women's development and the researcher's experience with battered women, Watson's (1988) nursing theory of human science and human care and Gilligan's (1982) theory of women's moral development were synthesized to create a model of moral conflict and voice. Specific constructs and propositions within this model were used as a framework for this inquiry.

The phenomena of moral conflict, psychological distress and psychological resilience, and transition from goodness to truth were examined by two methods: (a) the interpretive method of reading narrative for conflict and choice for self and moral voice, (b) the quantitative measure the "Silencing the Self Scale".

Three major categories of decisions which reflect moral conflict for women in abusive relationships were explicated from the data. These were: the decision to leave the abusive relationship, decisions that threaten sense of self, and decisions of resistance.

The experience of self was explicated from the narratives as the voice of separation and the relational voice of caring connection for others and for self. Five voices of separation and connection were identified in the narratives. The voices are progressively more relational. The voices were found to be closely associated in specific ways with passages that indicated the transition from goodness to truth, as described by Gilligan (1977, 1982), and the voices of psychological distress and psychological resilience, as described by Rogers, Brown, & Tappan (1994).

The unique contribution of this study is the model of moral conflict and voice. The research findings were utilized to develop and refine the model. The model offers a picture of the relationships between moral conflict and voice in women who have experienced abuse.

The findings of this study make explicit the dimensions of moral conflict inherent in decisions battered women make. Explication of these moral conflict issues and the ways in which women seek to resolve them provides another avenue through which to understand an abused woman's life, a perspective not found in other studies.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-12, Section: B, page: 7446.

Thesis (PH.D.)--WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY, 1996.

School code: 0254.