Shock and awe
Subtitle: achieving rapid dominance
By: Harlan K. Ullman and James P. Wade ; with L.A. "Bud" Edney ... [et al.].
Contributors: Wade, James P., 1930-; Edney, L. A.; National Defense University. Institute for National Strategic Studies.
Publisher: Center for Advanced Concepts and Technology; For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Superintendent of Documents
Published: 1996
Place of publication: Washington, DC
Language: eng
Number of pages: 199
Subjects: Rapid dominance (Military science); Awe.; Shock.
Other titles: Shock & awe
Description: The purpose of this paper is to explore alternative concepts for structuring mission capability packages (MCP's) around which future U.S. military forces might be configured. From the very outset of this study group's deliberations, we agreed that the most useful contribution we could make would be to attempt to reach beyond what we saw as the current and commendable efforts, largely but not entirely, within the Department of Defense to define concepts for strategy, doctrine, operations, and force structure to deal with a highly uncertain future. In approaching this endeavor, we fully recognized the inherent and actual limits and difficulties in attempting to reach beyond what may prove to be the full extent of our grasp. It is, of course, clear that U.S. military forces are currently the most capable in the world and are likely to remain so for a long time to come. Why then, many will ask, should we examine and even propose major excursions and changes if the country occupies this position of military superiority? For reasons noted in this paper, we believe that excursions are important if only to confirm the validity of current defense approaches. There are several overreaching realties that have led us to this conclusion. First, while everyone recognizes that the Cold War has ended, no one has yet been able to describe or predict what this means for more precisely defining the nature of our future security needs. Despite this absence of both clairvoyance and a galvanizing external danger, the United States has become refreshingly open in examining new strategic options and choices. The variety of conceptual efforts underway in the Pentagon to deal with this uncertainty exemplifies this reality.
Notes: "National Defense University, Institute for National Strategic Studies"--Cover.