SELF-REGULATION, LEARNED RESOURCEFULNESS, CREATIVE IMAGINATION, AND MOTIVATION IN HABITUAL EXERCISERS AND NONEXERCISERS.
Contributors: University of South Carolina.
Published: 1995
Number of pages: 115
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Psychology, Behavioral.; Health Sciences, Recreation.
Description: The purpose of this descriptive correlational study was to discuss the relationship among self-regulation, learned resourcefulness, creative imagination, and motivation in habitual exercisers and nonexercisers. The convenience sample consisting of 159 healthy subjects, 73 habitual exercisers and 86 nonexercisers, completed four questionnaires and a demographic data questionnaire with a Visual Analogue Scale for Perceived Level of Fitness.

A correlation matrix of all study variables using Spearman rho correlation coefficients revealed low to moderately high correlations (.16 to.56) between characteristics of habitual exercisers and nonexercisers and the primary study variables of self-regulation, learned resourcefulness, creative imagination and motivation. T-tests revealed no significant differences in habitual exercisers and nonexercisers on the mean scores for the Creative Imagination Scale (CIS), Carolina Self-Regulation Inventory (CSRI), Self-Motivation Inventory (SMI), Self-Control Schedule (SCS) and the Visual Analogue Scale for Perceived Level of Fitness (PLF). When the four tools were analyzed for differences by gender, the CIS revealed a significant difference (p =.0241), with the total mean score being higher for the females than males. Also, no significant difference was noted in the two groups by race, marital status, socioeconomic status, height, body mass index, or prior experience with exercise. The only significant differences between groups were age (p =.0031), and educational status (p =.0002), with the exercisers more educated than the nonexercisers.

The multiple logistic regression, with maximum likelihood estimate, was used to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted estimate of adherence with 95% confidence intervals. An adjusted association of the study variables with exercise adherence revealed no significant association between age, gender, exercising when 6 to 15 years of age, or the total mean scores on the CIS, CSRI, SMI and SCS instruments. However, socioeconomic status (p =.0326) and PLF (p =.0001) were associated with exercise adherence. The model suggests that the odds for exercise adherence are 1.1 times greater for subjects who have a higher socioeconomic status and 1.11 times greater for the subjects with a high PLF.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-08, Section: B, page: 4240.

Thesis (PH.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1995.

School code: 0202.