constitutional legitimacy and illegitimacy of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act.
Published: 2004
Language: eng
Number of pages: 67
Subjects: University of Toronto. -- Faculty of Law -- Dissertations.; Canada.; Human reproduction -- Law and legislation.; Constitutional law -- Canada.; Criminal law -- Canada.
Description: Parliament's reliance on its criminal law power to intervene in the field of new reproductive technologies raises several division-of-powers questions. Neither theoretical rationales nor jurisprudential principles can justify the extensive recourse to criminal law undertaken by the federal Parliament. The expansion of the scope of this power endangers federalism because it annihilates the balance between the two orders of legislative power, allowing Parliament to legislate in exclusive provincial matters. Parliament fails to respect the principle that criminal law must be used with restraint and only when fundamental values are seriously at risk; the Act imposes criminal sanctions for minor threats, undermining the efficacy of criminal law as a mean of social control. Also, the delegation of regulatory power to the executive branch of the government is questionable, along with the validity of the equivalency agreement mechanism that confers to Parliament the authority to overlook valid provincial legislations.
Notes: Adviser:  Bernard Dickens.

Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Toronto, 2004.

Electronic version licensed for access by U. of T. users.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-03, page: 0720.

MICR copy on microfiche (1 microfiche).