Relationship between observer counts and abundance of coho salmon in Steep Creek, northern southeast Alaska in 1996
By: by Edgar L. Jones III and Scott A. McPherson.
Contributors: McPherson, Scott A.; Alaska. Division of Sport Fish.
Series: Fishery data series -- no. 97-25.
Publisher: Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish, Research and Technical Services
Published: 1997
Place of publication: Anchorage
Language: eng
Number of pages: 30
Subjects: Coho salmon -- Alaska -- Steep Creek -- Statistics.; Fish tagging -- Alaska -- Steep Creek -- Statistics.; Fishes -- Alaska -- Steep Creek -- Statistics.
Description: A mark-recapture experiment was used to estimate total escapement of coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch returning to Steep Creek, a tributary of Mendenhall Lake located in the upper Mendenhall River drainage near Juneau, Alaska during the fall of 1996. Three-hundred and forty-four unique coho salmon were captured in beach seines and dipnets between 30 September and 15 November. All were marked with uniquely numbered anchor tags and given a secondary mark consisting of an opercle punch. Between 6 October and 23 November, 637 fish were inspected for marks, many of which having already been captured, and of these, 342 (50%) had a primary or secondary mark present. The Jolly-Seber model was used to estimate a total escapement of 477 (SE=37) coho salmon. In addition, 5 weekly estimates of abundance were calculated as 201, 170, 176, 230, and 135 coho salmon corresponding to weeks 2-6 (6-12 October through 3-9 November). As part of regular escapement monitoring activities, three foot surveys were conducted between 8 October and 31 October to count the number of coho salmon observed in a single day at Steep Creek. The peak observer count was 134 on 8 October, representing 28% of the estimated total escapement. In addition to these counts, other ADF&G personnel made foot counts and from these, the highest observer count was 151 (29 October), representing 32% of the total escapement. On average, observers underestimated the weekly abundance of fish by a mean relative bias of -50%.
Notes: "October 1997"

Includes bibliographical references (p. 19-20)

Also issued online.