COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AMONG NURSES IN PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITALS.
Contributors: Temple University.
Published: 1984
Number of pages: 114
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: Nurses, like other professional groups have used collective bargaining in the hope of improving the profession and effecting improvements in client care. The answer to whether or not they have been successful lay in the real work world. In an effort to explore the impact of collective bargaining the researcher posed five questions for study. Are there differences in the responses of nurses using collective bargaining and those not using collective bargaining to questionnaire items addressing the following: job satisfaction; perception of participating in making decisions about clients' care; access to formal, written grievance procedures; number of holidays/personal and vacation days earned and the amount of salary received.

To obtain information, a pencil and paper questionnaire was developed. A review of the literature, interviews with staff nurses and a panel of experts aided the researcher in constructing the questionnaire. The final version consisted of 51 forced-choice items seeking data regarding each of the five Research Questions. To assist the respondents in answering the questions and to categorize the data, a five category system was used, "strongly agree," "agree," "undecided," "disagree," and "strongly disagree." The questionnaire was pilot tested and found to have an internal consistency at an alpha reliability estimate 0.60 and Lambda 2 reliability of 0.681.

A matching set of collective bargaining (number 7) and non-collective bargaining hospitals (number 9) was selected and the staff nurses in these hospitals responded to the questionnaire. Information Kits containing the questionnaires were mailed to the directors of nursing service. The directors assumed responsibility for distributing the questionnaires, collecting and returning them to the researcher.

The Likert scale one to five was used to order the responses to the first 30 items, with "one" indicating the least favorable response and "five" indicating the most favorable response. The t test was used to test the null hypothesis that the response was the same in each of the two populations. Items 31 to 51 were treated by developing frequency distributions for each item. Cross tabulations and chi square were used to further identify the statistical significance of the data. . . . (Author's abstract exceeds stipulated maximum length. Discontinued here with permission of author.) UMI.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 45-07, Section: B, page: 2107.

Thesis (ED.D.)--TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, 1984.

School code: 0225.