Nothing to hide the false tradeoff between privacy and security
By: Daniel J. Solove
Publisher: Yale University Press
Published: 2011
Place of publication: New Haven
Language: eng
Number of pages: 245
ISBN-13: 9780300172317
Subjects: Law enforcement; Law and legislation; National security; Right of Privacy
Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index.
Table of contents: title: The nothing-to-hide argument; title: The all-or-nothing fallacy; title: The danger of deference; title: Why privacy isn't merely an individual right; title: The pendulum argument; title: The national-security argument; title: The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction; title: The war-powers argument and the rule of law; title: The fourth amendment and the secrecy paradigm; title: The third party doctrine and digital dossiers; title: The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy; title: The suspicionless-searches argument; title: Should we keep the exclusionary rule?; title: The first amendment as criminal procedure; title: Will repealing the patriot act restore our privacy?; title: The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument; title: Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument; title: Should the government engage in data mining?; title: The luddite argument, the titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy; title: Conclusion.