A Qvench-Coale. Or A briefe Disquisition and Inquirie, in vvhat place of the Church or Chancell the Lords-Table ought to be situated, especially vvhen the Sacrament is administred? VVherein is evidently proved, that the Lords-Table ought to be placed in the Midst of the Church, Chancell, or Quire North and South, not Alter-wise, with one side against the wall
Subtitle: That it neither is or ought to be stiled an Altar; That Christians have no other Altar but Christ alone, who hath abolished all other Altars, which are either Heathenish, Jewish, or Popish, and not tollerable among Christians. All the Pretences, Authorities, Arguments of Mr. Richard Shelford, Edmond Reeve, Dr. John Pocklington, and A late Coale from the Altar, to the contrary in defence of Altars, calling the Lords- Table an Altar, or placing it Altar- wise, are here likewise fully answered and proved to be vaine or forged
By: By a well-wisher to the truth of God, and the Church of England. ... (8 lines)
Contributors: Pocklington, John, president of Pembroke Hall and Sidney College, Cambridge, -1642; Heylyn, Peter, 1600-1662; Shelford, Richard, priest, author of Treatise conc. Antichrist; Reeve, Edmund (Judge, common pleas), 1585?-1647; McAlpin Collection of British History and Theology (Burke Library at Union Theological Seminary)
Publisher: [publisher not identified]
Published: 1637
Place of publication: [Place of publication not identified]
Language: eng
Number of pages: 358
Notes: Pp. 321-328 mispaged.

Cambr. Univ. Cat, 6365; author anonymous