Health status, health care and inequality
Subtitle: canada vs. the u.s.
By: June E. O'Neill, Dave M. O'Neill
Contributors: O'Neill, David M.; National Bureau of Economic Research
Series: NBER working paper series -- working paper 13429; Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research : Online) -- working paper no. 13429.
Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research
Published: 2007
Place of publication: Cambridge, MA
Language: eng
Format: [electronic resource] :
Description: "Does Canada's publicly funded, single payer health care system deliver better health outcomes and distribute health resources more equitably than the multi-payer heavily private U.S.  system? We show that the efficacy of health care systems cannot be usefully evaluated by comparisons of infant mortality and life expectancy.  We analyze several alternative measures of health status using JCUSH (The Joint Canada/U.S.  Survey of Health) and other surveys.  We find a somewhat higher incidence of chronic health conditions in the U.S.  than in Canada but somewhat greater U.S.  access to treatment for these conditions.  Moreover, a significantly higher percentage of U.S.  women and men are screened for major forms of cancer.  Although health status, measured in various ways is similar in both countries, mortality/incidence ratios for various cancers tend to be higher in Canada.  The need to ration resources in Canada, where care is delivered "free", ultimately leads to long waits.  In the U.S., costs are more often a source of unmet needs.  We also find that Canada has no more abolished the tendency for health status to improve with income than have other countries.  Indeed, the health-income gradient is slightly steeper in Canada than it is in the U.S"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Notes: Title from PDF file as viewed on 9/26/2007.

Includes bibliographical references.

Also available in print.

System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Mode of access: World Wide Web.