NURSING HOME PSYCHOLOGISTS: JOB DESCRIPTIONS, RESPONSES ON AN AUTONOMY V. PATERNALISM SCALE, AND ETHICS.
Contributors: University of Texas at Austin.
Published: 1994
Number of pages: 230
Subjects: Education, Guidance and Counseling.; Psychology, General.; Health Sciences, Education.
Description: In 1987, under terms of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, the federal government recognized psychologists as, directly reimbursable, primary health care providers. By 1993 new federal guidelines had put psychologists on an equal footing with physicians in the pre-admissions assessment and yearly reevaluation of nursing home residents. These developments along with the extension of life expectancies will have a profound impact upon nursing homes as practice sites for psychologists. No literature exists, however, detailing the various structures of employment, working conditions, job descriptions, professional concerns, and professional philosophies and behaviors of nursing home psychologists.

A questionnaire--grounded in part on an extensive literature review of psycho/bio/medical ethics as well as the history and development of nursing homes in America--was developed to explore these issues. It was mailed to all 122 members of The American Psychological Association who had identified themselves as being nursing home psychologists. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 64 respondents. The mean of several items on the questionnaire was computed so as to yield a Patient Autonomy v. Practitioner Preference Scale. The relationship(s) between these mean scores and the respondents' demographic data were examined.

It was found that a very small percentage of the sample were direct employees of a nursing home; most were fee-for-service providers. Many described poor working environments in terms of both, physical accommodations and professional relationships. While most were inclined to favor patient autonomy over practitioner paternalism, the autonomy scores were inversely correlated with the ages of the psychologists. Finally, there was evidence to suggest that nursing home psychologists did not closely adhere to the American Psychological Association's Code of Professional Ethics; especially on issues related to protecting their patients' rights to privacy and confidentiality and to gaining an informed consent for treatment.

This study identified several critical areas that require further research regarding the training and ethical behavior of nursing home psychologists.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-10, Section: A, page: 3094.

Thesis (PH.D.)--THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, 1994.

School code: 0227.