A COMPARISON OF COPING RESPONSES OF NONDEPRESSED BLACK FEMALES AND CLINICALLY DEPRESSED BLACK FEMALES TO PERCEIVED RACIAL PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION.
Contributors: University of Texas at Austin.
Published: 1984
Number of pages: 198
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Black Studies.
Description: Black women cope with the stress of racial prejudice and discrimination with fewer detrimental effects through a process which has been named integrative adjustment. The study encompassed integrative and disintegrative processes in these women.

Data for the study were collected in 1983 over a 6 month period in the Austin area. Black women diagnosed clinically depressed and nondepressed black women were the two groups interviewed: a total of 30 women participated in this study. The data came from 30 interviews that ranged from one to two sessions each lasting at least one hour. Participants' age span ranged from 23 to 45 years. The two groups--the depressed and the nondepressed groups were matched on the following variables (1) age (2) educational preparation, and (3) marital status.

Data analysis was divided into two phases (1) quantitative analysis and (2) qualitative analysis. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the two groups on selected variables previously identified as mediating factors in the coping process. Self-esteem ratings one of these variables was significantly different for the two groups. Qualitative analysis was effected through the constant comparative method. This method was used to generate theory from the data. The integrative/disintegrative adjustment theoretical model was the result of this analysis.

The processes which enhance integration in black women are contrasted in this study with the processes which inhibit integration and result in varying degrees of disintegration in the individual. Integrative adjustment comprises three supporting dimensions questioning, which is carried out consciously or unconsciously; persisting which refers to the process of actively doing something to change the discriminatory situation; and positive focusing involves activities that are directed toward positive outcomes to affect changes. Contrasting dimensions which tend to lead one toward disintegration are accepting, which is behavior that acts to alter one's perception of the situation; stalling is behavior that involves activity that does not support a positive resolution of the problem; and negative focusing which involves activities directed toward retaliating against the offender.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 45-07, Section: B, page: 2099.

Thesis (PH.D.)--THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, 1984.

School code: 0227.