A supplement to the first and second parts of lay baptism invalid, shewing that the heretical and schismatical baptisms which some ancient churches esteem'd to have been valid, were not lay baptisms, in the opinion of those churches
Subtitle: In answer to the second part of Mr. Bingham's pretended Scholastical history of lay baptism and prov'd out of that same book, and the other writings of Mr. Bingham
By: With a caveat against Dr. White Kennet's Dangerous notion of the power of divine grace, and his Sophistical rule for judging doctrines, in his Sermon at the funeral of the Duke of Devonshire, and his Spittal-sermon on Easter Tuesday, 1714 ... By the author of Lay baptism invalid
Contributors: Kennett, White, 1660-1728
Publisher: Printed by G. James for H. Clements
Published: 1714
Place of publication: London
Language: eng
Number of pages: 151
Subjects: Baptism; Early works to 1800
Other titles: Lay baptism invalid, supplement.
Notes: Published anonymously.