Two-party politics in the one-party South
Subtitle: Alabama's hill country, 1874-1920
By: Samuel L. Webb.
Publisher: University of Alabama Press
Published: 1997
Place of publication: Tuscaloosa
Language: eng
Number of pages: 286
Subjects: Political culture -- Alabama -- History -- 19th century.; Political culture -- Alabama -- History -- 20th century.; Political parties -- Alabama -- History -- 19th century.; Political parties -- Alabama -- History -- 20th century.; Alabama -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950.
Description: Samuel L. Webb presents new evidence that, contrary to popular belief, voters in at least one Deep South state did not flee en masse from the Republican party after Reconstruction. Instead, as Webb conclusively demonstrates, the party gained strength among white voters in northern Alabama's Hill Country region between 1896 and 1920.

Not only did GOP presidential candidates win more than a dozen area counties during this period but also Republican congressional candidates made progress in Democratic strongholds and local officials gained control of several county courthouses.

These new Republicans were not simply the descendants of anti-Confederate families, as some historians have claimed. Rather, they were former independents, Greenbackers, and Populists, who, in keeping with the 1890s Populist movement, reacted against what they perceived as the takeover of the Democratic party by the "moneyed elites" and Black Belt planter-landlords. By 1900, many Hill Country Populists had found a congenial home in the GOP, albeit one with a populist and progressive bent.

Webb breaks with previous historical opinion by showing that ex-Populists in the Hill Country, who were radical reformers during the 1890s, remained reform minded after 1900. Continuity existed between their movement and progressivism. Webb uses the pivotal year of 1912 to exemplify how many ex-Populists were attracted by Theodore Roosevelt and his Bull Moose Progressive party and supported a variety of reforms, particularly those related to the rights of labor.

Webb then analyzes retrospectively and prospectively the reasons for the movement.
Notes: Includes bibliographical references (p. [263]-273) and index.