LEARNING STYLES, LEARNING PREFERENCES, AND PERSONALITY TYPES OF TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL NURSING STUDENTS.
Contributors: Georgia State University.
Published: 1987
Number of pages: 240
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Education, Educational Psychology.
Description: Purpose. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences among traditional and nontraditional nursing students relative to selected variables which may impact upon learning and the influence of selected demographics. The specific variables examined were: learning styles, learning preferences, and personality types.

Methods and Procedures. The sample in the descriptive study consisted of 118 female and 5 male nursing students from three baccalaureate programs and one associate degree nursing program. Data were analyzed using SPSSX programs for multivariate analysis of variance, analysis of variance, and canonical correlation analysis.

Learning styles, learning preferences, and personality types were measured by self-report instruments administered to the subjects. These instruments were Learning Style Inventory (Kolb, 1985), Learning Preference Inventory (Rezler, 1977), and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Myers-Briggs, 1986).

Results. A significant difference in the learning styles of traditional and nontraditional nursing students was found on the Active-Reflective learning style dimension (p =.03). Traditional nursing students were more active in their learning orientations.

Traditional and nontraditional nursing students did not differ significantly in their learning preferences or in their personality types. Although the overall multivariate analysis did not reach significance, certain factors on the learning preference and personality dimensions showed significant differences between the two groups of students by the univariate F ratios.

Personality type correlated significantly with learning styles and learning preferences on two of the four correlations. The first correlation accounted for 27% of the total variance, and the second correlation accounted for 21% of the total variance.

Conclusions. Consistent with other findings reported in the literature, traditional and nontraditional students differ in their learning styles. The two groups of students did not differ significantly in their learning preferences and personality types. However, certain learning preferences and personality factors tended to contribute significantly to differences among the two groups. Personality factors contributed significant relationships to learning styles and learning preferences.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 48-09, Section: B, page: 2603.

Thesis (PH.D.)--GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 1987.

School code: 0079.