DETERMINATION OF THE APPROPRIATENESS OF ONCOLOGY LITERATURE FOR THE NURSE BY MEASURING READING LEVEL OF THE NURSE AND ONCOLOGY LITERATURE (READABILITY).
Contributors: University of Alabama.
Published: 1986
Number of pages: 90
Subjects: Education, Curriculum and Instruction.; Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: Nursing, like many other professions, is in the midst of exploding theory and technology. With this knowledge explosion, accepted methodologies rapidly become obsolete. Maintaining currency in nursing practice is a must. One of the areas of health care that has experienced the exploding theory and technology is oncology nursing. One avenue enabling nurses to expand their knowledge and keep their skills current is the large number of professional journals.

Literature on oncology nursing has proliferated in the past decade. Authors of the publications exhibit a broad range of educational preparation. Manuscripts may be written by nurses holding diplomas, associate and baccalaureate degrees as well as master's and doctorates. Authors may be physicians, physiologists or sociologists. The audience for these journals include nurses who hold two-year associate, diploma, baccalaureate, masters and doctoral degrees. The diversity of educational preparation of the reader and the authors of published material initiated the question which instituted this study: Was nursing literature readable by the practicing nurse?.

The purpose of the study was to determine the readability of oncology literature for the practicing nurse. The grade level readability of selected oncology literature and the grade level at which practicing nurses read was measured and the relationship of the data determined.

This was a descriptive study using the Fry Readability Formula, adapted, and the Nelson-Denny Reading Test (NDRT). Descriptive statistics for reading level and readability were calculated. A t-test for independent groups was used to determine statistical significance between the mean reading level and readability. A Mann-Whitney test was used to determine statistically significant differences between the median reading level and readability. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA were used to compare the means and medians of the three sources of oncology literature.

Analysis of the data revealed that 54% of the nurses could read all of the literature. Data from the NDRT indicted that the reading grade level range was grade 8 through 16 with a mean of 14.30. The Fry Readability grade level ranged from grade 8 through 16, with a mean of 13.71.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 47-06, Section: A, page: 2002.

Thesis (ED.D.)--THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, 1986.

School code: 0004.