The kiss of peace
Subtitle: or, England and Rome at one on the doctrine of the Holy Eucharist : an essay in two parts ; together with a sequel, or answer to criticisms on the same
By: by Gerard Francis Cobb.
Edition: 2nd ed.
Publisher: J.T. Hays; Pott and Amery
Published: 1867
Place of publication: London; New York
Language: eng
Number of pages: 500
Notes: First part revised and corrected from the first edition; the second part consists of entirely new material. - Cf. pref.

Library copy a presentation copy to E.K. Kendall from the library of Bishop Samuel Blunt. Title page signed S.B. Blunt.

Includes bibliographical references.
Table of contents: title: ANALYTICAL CONTENTS.; title: [For the following careful Summary and Analysis the writer of this Essay is indebted to the kindness of a friend, to whom he desires here to render his public acknowledgments.]; title: PART I.; title: Section I.; title: Three Eucharistic Theories current in the English Church 1; title: a. Consecration only a setting apart for a holy use — Symbolism ib.; title: b. Consecration confers a Potential Presence — the Theory of Reception 2; title: Subdivided into; title: a. Virtualism — the benefit or virtue of Christ's Body and Blood alone received 5; title: b. Realism — the Body and Blood really received ib.; title: c. Consecration effectuates the Real Objective Presence of Christ ib.; title: Distinction stated between the last and the two former opinions 6; title: Explanation of the word Objective ib.; title: Realism implies only a subjective Presence; title: The doctrine of the Real Objective Presence declares against —; title: 1. The Symbolist that there is a Presence.; title: 2. The Virtualist that it is a real Presence.; title: 3. The Realist that it is an objective not a subjective Presence 9; title: Section II.; title: What does the Church of England say herself? 10; title: Symbolist and Catholic have here no common ground of argument ib.; title: Fallacy of Private Judgment 11; title: Article XX. quoted 12; title: Illustration from use of Athanasian Creed 13; title: Objection — It is only private judgment that] determines what the Church of England teaches on the question ib.; title: Reply — Catechism of 1604 is the Church's voice speaking authoritatively 14; title: Catechism says that neither the Symbolist nor Virtualist nor Realist fully states the Church's doctrine.; title: 1. To the Symbolist it says —; title: "The Body and Blood of Christ are " [in some sense] "received by the faithful in the Lord's Supper," and not mere Bread and Wine 16; title: 2. To the Virtualist —; title: "The Body and Blood of Christ are verily and indeed, &c." not merely in effect and virtue 17; title: Objections from words of Article XXVIII. ib.; title: ,, ,, Post Communion ib.; title: S. To the Realist —; title: "The Body and Blood of Christ are verily and indeed taken and received," &c 19; title: Meaning of the word faithful 20; title: Words of Article XXVIII., "given, taken, and eaten" 21; title: "Give" and "take" necessarily imply the objective character of the Presence ib.; title: Statement of the Church's doctrine —; title: 1. Communion was not the primary object of the Institution 22; title: Two Errors current —; title: a. Of Theory — confining the Presence to the act of reception 23; title: 0. Of Practice — in neglect of non-communicating attendance ib.; title: Rubrics must be read by dogmatic light of the Catechism ib.; title: 2. Eucharist treated of under three heads —; title: a. Signum Sacramenti or Sacramentum ="outward sign ordained by Christ Himself" ib.; title: b. Res Sacramenti = "thing signified" 24; title: y. Virtue Sacramenti = "benefit or effect of receiving the same" ib.; title: The word Sacrament is sometimes used not in its strict sense 24; title: The wicked receive the Res, not the Virtus Sacramenti 25; title: Illustration from light and vision 25; title: Section III.; title: The Eucharistic Sacrifice 30; title: The continual remembrance=memorial Sacrifice ib.; title: Significance of it  31; title: Objection from Article XXXI. — the Sacrifices of Masses 35; title: Sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving ib.; title: Omission of the word Altar in Prayer-Book ib.; title: Reply 34; title: Title Ccena Domini used equally by Rome and England 30; title: Difficulties are real and logical, not merely questions of externals 40; title: Each party holds some portion of truth 41; title: True Symbolism 42; title: Catholic Ritual no chance form ib.; title: True Virtualism 44; title: The true use of the Real Presence 45; title: Superiority of Worship to Prayer 46; title: The Presence anterior to Communion — therefore the Holy Eucharist the great act of Worship and Adoration 47; title: Summary of the Argument 40; title: PART II.; title: PROPOSITION.; title: Rome and England do not use the word Transubstantiation in the same sense 54; title: Doctrine of Real Objective Presence does involve Transubstantiation ib.; title: Section I.; title: By Transubstantiation English Church means; title: Transaccidentation 55; title: Explanation of word Accidents ib.; title: " " Substance 56; title: Illustration — Same substance in corn, flour, and bread, while accidents are changed 57; title: The Latin word substantia has only this definite meaning, and does not include the loose meanings given to the English word substanee 58; title: Explanation of word Transubstantiation in Roman use 59; title: Season necessitates belief in Transubstantiation as a corollary from the doctrine of the Real Objective Presence 60; title: Faith and Season ib.; title: Before Consecration the Elements were things (res) :; title: after, they are only forms (signa) 61; title: This shewn by language of Catechism 62; title: Primary law of thought that a thing cannot be substantially two things at once 63; title: Hence, if there is a change, that change must be Transubstantiation ib.; title: Roman statement simply affirms this law, and does not over-define 64; title: Necessary Corollary from our Lord's own Words 65; title: Decree of Council of Trent quoted 66; title: Bishop Andrewes's misconception of the Roman statement 67; title: Rome repudiates the possibility of "expressing the mode of the Presence in words" 68; title: Necessity and Meaning of the word whole in the Tridentine Decree 70; title: Tridentine definition at once a touchstone of erroneous belief and a shield against scepticism 72; title: Section II.; title: Objections — 1. Does not Rome mean by substantially something more than has hitherto been stated? 78; title: Do not the 'words vere et realiter' correspond with the English "verily and indeed," &c.? Is not substantialiter an addition expressing something more than the English doctrine of the Real Objective Presence? 74; title: Reply.; title: All decrees of Councils lay down not only what is to be believed, but what is not to be believed ib.; title: Substantialiter is opposed to virtualiter ib.; title: English word "Verily" opposes the two errors —; title: 1. That the consecrated elements are only signa.; title: 2. That Christ is only present in jigura 75; title: Vere is opposed to (1), realiter to (2) ib.; title: The word "indeed" opposes Virtualism, and is equivalent to substantialiter 76; title: II. Is it impossible to conceive the co-existence of two substances?; title: Mr. Stuart quoted in support of this objection 76; title: He parallels the hypostatic union with the co-existence of "Bread and our Lord's Body" 77; title: Reply — Mr. Stuart unconsciously misrepresents the Roman definition 78; title: Hypostatic union not parallel. Person there equivalent to substance in inanimate nature ib.; title: Mr. Mackonochie's "Pastoral" quoted 80; title: Here again confusion of language in speaking of "natural material substances." Substance is supernatural 81; title: Digression; title: The hidden sacramentality of nature 82; title: The Catholic doctrine enables us to look behind the accidents to the substance, from the natural to the supernatural 83; title: The denial of the Real Objective Presence results often from a materialistic clinging to sense 85; title: The miracle of the Altar the greatest of all miracles 66; title: Parallel between Judaic objections (S. John vi.) and modem unbelief 67; title: The phrase "natural material substances" must be equivalent to accidents, or it is a contradiction in terms 88; title: Strict language ought to be used on this subject 89; title: A change must be made either in the accidents or in the substance ; it certainly is not in the former, therefore it must be ill the latter ib.; title: Section III.; title: Case pat of a youth instructed in the Real Objective Presence. He answers to the question, "What is this?" "It is the Body of Christ" 90; title: The formula of Transubstantiation merely puts into the mouths of the faithful what they have already conceived in their minds 91; title: Objection — The English Church protests against a natural Presence, and it is generally believed that Rome holds a carnal Presence, and on that account withholds the cup from her laity 92; title: Reply — Explanation of spiritual as opposed to natural. 94; title: Spiritual not used in a subjective sense in connection with the Eucharist 95; title: The meaning of spiritual in the English Liturgy and Articles cannot be such as would be contradictory of the Catechism ib.; title: Spiritual has a real objective meaning equivalent to supernatural 97; title: No Symbolist would have drawn the article when thus explained 98; title: Propositions —; title: 1. The Roman formula maintains the Real Objective Presence to be a spiritual and heavenly Presence 100; title: 2. She does not believe it to be a natural and earthly Presence ib.; title: Proof — Con. Trid., Sess. XIII., c. 1 ib.; title: 3. Rome does not hold Transaccidentation. Proof — Reasons assigned for Communion in one kind 106; title: Summary of foregoing points 107; title: Section IV.; title: The Church of England rejects not Transubstantiation, but Transaccidentation 109; title: The Declaration on kneeling — supposed difficulties in 110; title: "Very natural substances" mean really "very natural properties," i. e. accidents, and Transubstantiation means Transaccidentation Ill; title: No epithets can be applied to substance ib.; title: Argument from word "bodily" 112; title: Mr. Carter quoted to shew loose popular use of substance as equivalent to properties 115; title: Supposed difficulties in Art. XXVIII 116; title: No one would have drawn such a statement to oppose the Tridentine formula ib.; title: Mr. Carter again quoted 118; title: Bishop ForRes quoted as implying that Rome holds removal of the munus temporale 119; title: Reply to this misconception 120; title: Article really protests against a carnal Presence 121; title: The Article affirms — "Transubstantiation overthroweth the nature of a Sacrament," &c. ; but the Roman formula does not do so, though Transaccidentation does 122; title: Nature of Christ's Presence and nature of change in the Elements are strictly correlative ideas 124; title: The Roman Church had the task of strengthening faith ; the English of defending it against superstitious corruptions. The work of the one was positive, that of the other negative 126; title: Hence the two co-ordinate propositions.; title: (1.) While Rome says —; title: "In whatever sense the Bread becomes Christ's Body in that sense it ceases to be Bread" 130; title: (2.) England says —; title: "In whatever sense it remains Bread, it does not in that sense becomes Christ's Body " ib.; title: Conclusion —; title: Little danger now of men believing in carnal or natural Presence 132; title: Desirable to relinquish the English Protestations 133; title: Practical suggestions 134; title: Recent utterances of English Dignitaries 135; title: Appeal for Unity 137; title: POSTSCRIPT —; title: Examination of a Letter to the Guardian from the Rev. Reginald Smith 140; title: The Editor believes Roman Transubstantiation to be a carnal Presence 147; title: Two general answers —; title: I. The Marian persecution political, not doctrinal; and the doctrines of the Martyrs identical with those of the Council of Trent 148; title: II. The senses are not deceived in Transubstantiation, and an appeal to sense as sole arbiter unwarranted in matters divine 150; title: APPENDIX.; title: Note A. — Examination of objections to use of Aristotelian terminology. 155; title: Note B. — Further criticism of the supposed parallel of the Hypostatic Union 160; title: Note C. — Examination of the popular objections against the Roman use of Communion in one kind 166