WITHDRAWING ARTIFICIAL FEEDINGS: PRIORITIES ASSIGNED BY PROFESSIONAL NURSES TO PRINCIPLES OF ETHICAL DECISION MAKING (DECISION MAKING).
Contributors: Temple University.
Published: 1991
Number of pages: 237
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: The primary purpose of this study was to examine the priorities given to various principles of ethical decision making by examining attitudes held by professional nurses as they consider decisions to withdraw artificial feedings.

A survey research approach that employed simulation measurement techniques was used. The data collection instrument consisted of a case vignette followed by statements reflecting four principles of ethical decision making (sanctity of life, autonomy, justice, and beneficence) and four decision items as to the amount of agreement to withdraw four types of artificial feedings. There were six demographic variables queried. Three versions of the instrument were precisely the same except the patient's level of consciousness and competence was varied.

The subjects were 441 professional nurse volunteers who work on adult medical/surgical and critical care units in ten acute care hospitals in the greater Philadelphia area.

There was no effect on the priority assigned to ethical principles as a function of the patient's level of consciousness and competence, suggesting that the decision to withdraw artificial feedings is not a function of case. Mean scores on agreement to withdraw reflected a high degree of agreement with the decision to withdraw regardless of the type of artificial feeding that the patient is receiving.

Subjects scored autonomy and beneficence higher than sanctity of life and justice. Comparisons among means for each principle were found to yield significant differences in all cases. Because the priority assigned to ethical principles is a function of the type of artificial feeding, multiple regressions were performed and significant prediction models developed for each decision. The relative contribution that each principle makes to the decision model varies according to the type of artificial feeding.

The type of basic nursing education, the highest degree that the subject completed, and the age of the nurse had no effect on the priority assigned to ethical principles. The nurse's religiosity did affect the priority assignment as did the number of years in nursing. The nurse's religion was not tested because of unequal response cells.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-02, Section: B, page: 0753.

Thesis (PH.D.)--TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, 1991.

School code: 0225.