THE TEST OF A CAUSAL MODEL OF HOSPITAL NURSE ABSENTEEISM (JOB SATISFACTION, STRESS, ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT).
Contributors: University of Kansas.
Published: 1995
Number of pages: 299
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Psychology, Industrial.; Health Sciences, Health Care Management.
Description: Despite the importance of absenteeism in the workplace, there has been little theory development about the factors that contribute to hospital registered nurse absenteeism. The purpose of the multi-stage, path analysis model design was to test a causal model of hospital staff registered nurse absenteeism among a sample of 422 full-time employees of two large, midwestern medical centers. The model was a revision and extension of the absence model of Brooke (Brooke, 1986; Taunton et al., in press), incorporating information from Rhodes and Steers (1990) and the literature.

Within the model, personal (absence history, health, work values), structural (job stress, organizational support, routinization, autonomy, distributive justice, promotional opportunity, pay), and environmental characteristics (opportunity elsewhere, extra income, kinship responsibility, marital status: single) affected absence directly or through the endogenous variables of absence culture, job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Two measures of absence were used: the number of single-day absences per days scheduled to work and the number of absence episodes per days scheduled to work.

The researcher hypothesized that: (a) the causal pathways of the structural model for single-day absence and for absence frequency were as specified, (b) there would be no between-hospital differences in structural models of single-day absence, and (c) the correlates would not add significantly to the explanation of absence. The hypotheses were tested with EQS structural equation modeling statistical software.

The major findings of the study were: (a) the majority of the pathways in the model were not supported; (b) absence culture was an important variable in separate structural models of single-day absence, absence frequency, and in both hospital-level analyses; (c) there were between-hospital differences in structural models; the endogenous variables (satisfaction, involvement, and commitment) were important only in one hospital; (d) the correlates did not contribute to the explanation of absence. The best-fitting structural model (Hospital B) explained 23% of the variance in single-day absence.

The model provided useful information about absence and relationships within the model. The significant finding of absence culture provided new information to the study of absence.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-07, Section: B, page: 3693.

Thesis (PH.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS, 1995.

School code: 0099.