Localization and corruption
Subtitle: Panacea or Pandora's box?
By: Tugrul Gurgur and Anwar Shah.
Contributors: Shah, Anwar.; World Bank.
Series: Policy research working paper ;; 3486; Policy research working papers (Online) ;; 3486.
Publisher: World Bank
Published: 2005
Place of publication: [Washington, D.C
Language: eng
Format: Electronic resource
Subjects: Decentralization in management.; Corruption.
Description: "An extensive literature on the relationship between decentralization (or localization) and corruption has developed in recent years.  While some authors argue that there is a positive relationship between decentralization and corruption, others claim that decentralization in fact leads to a reduction in the level of corruption.  This important policy question has not yet been laid to rest since previous empirical work simply uses eclectic regressions and lacks a conceptual framework to discover the root causes of corruption.  Gurgur and Shah attempt to fill this void by presenting a framework in identifying the drivers of corruption both conceptually and empirically to isolate the role of centralized decisionmaking on corruption.  The following results emerge: * For a sample of 30 countries (developing and industrial), corruption is caused by a lack of service orientation in the public sector, weak democratic institutions, economic isolation (closed economy), colonial past, internal bureaucratic controls, and centralized decisionmaking.  * Decentralization is found to have a negative impact on corruption, with the effect being stronger in unitary than in federal countries.  This paper--a product of the Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Division, World Bank Institute--is part of a larger effort in the institute to exchange ideas on the reform of public sector governance"--World Bank web site.
Notes: Includes bibliographical references.
Title from PDF file as viewed on 1/21/2005.
Also available in print.
System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.