PRACTICE DOMAIN INVOLVEMENT OF DOCTORALLY PREPARED NURSING FACULTY IN THE NATIONAL LEAGUE FOR NURSING SOUTHERN REGION.
Contributors: Georgia State University.
Published: 1991
Number of pages: 220
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Education, Higher.; Health Sciences, Education.
Description: Statement of the problem. The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent doctorally prepared nursing educators have integrated practice into the nurse faculty role.

Methods. This descriptive survey study included a nonprobability sample of 37 schools of nursing with baccalaureate and/or graduate programs and a random sample of 180 faculty. Two researcher designed survey instruments were used. Practice domain involvement was conceptualized as faculty participation in one or more of the following activities within the context of the faculty role: faculty practice, research and publication collaboration with practice domain colleagues, practice domain consultation, and provision of educational programs in the practice domain.

Ten research questions were posed to determine the relationships among variables of interest. Data analysis included analysis of variance, chi-square, and descriptive statistics.

Results. Positive relationships were demonstrated between participation in faculty practice and participation in clinical research, writing clinical articles, consultation, and provision of educational programs, but all relationships were weak. There was a positive relationship between the presence of a nursing practice center within the nursing academic unit and the extent of faculty practice. No association was found between type of doctoral degree (nursing/nonnursing) and participation in faculty practice.

Faculty who practiced received a high level of personal satisfaction from their faculty practice and perceived practice as facilitating their participation in scholarly activities. Most faculty agreed faculty practice should be considered a scholarly activity and as important as the research and publication dimensions of the faculty role.

The most frequently indicated major reason for not engaging in faculty practice was the high value placed on research and publication in promotion decisions. Deans and faculty perceived practice as being the least valued activity among practice, publication, research, service, and teaching in relationship to attainment of the academic rewards of promotion, tenure, and merit pay.

Conclusions. The results suggested that though faculty receive a high degree of personal satisfaction from faculty practice and believe it should be considered a scholarly activity, the reward structures of both the nursing academic units and the institutions have constrained integration of practice as a dimension of the faculty role.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-05, Section: B, page: 2504.

Thesis (PH.D.)--GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 1991.

School code: 0079.