Mandatory versus voluntary disclosure of product risks
By: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell.
Contributors: Shavell, Steven.; John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business.
Series: Discussion paper -- no. 564; Discussion paper (John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business : Online) -- no. 564.
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Published: 2006
Place of publication: Cambridge, MA
Language: eng
Format: Electronic resource
Number of pages: 32
Description: "We analyze a model in which firms are able to acquire information about product risks and may or may not be required to disclose this information.  We initially study the effect of disclosure rules assuming that firms are not liable for the harm caused by their products.  Although mandatory disclosure obviously is superior to voluntary disclosure given the information about product risks that firms possess &mdash;since such information has value to consumers &mdash; voluntary disclosure induces firms to acquire more information about product risks because they can keep silent if the information is unfavorable.  The latter effect could lead to higher social welfare under voluntary disclosure.  The same results hold if firms are liable for harm under the negligence standard of liability.  Under strict liability, however, firms are indifferent about revealing information concerning product risk, and mandatory and voluntary disclosure rules are equivalent"--John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business web site.
Notes: Title from PDF file as viewed on 3/16/2007.

Includes bibliographical references.

Also available in print.

System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Mode of access: World Wide Web.