Is Separate Unequal? Black Colleges and the Challenge to Desegregation
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
Published: February 2004
Language: eng
Format: Hardcover
Number of pages: 240
ISBN-13: 9780700613014
Subjects: Black studies; Higher & further education; Education / Teaching; Education; USA; Educational Policy & Reform; Ethnic Studies - African American Studies - General; Higher; Political Freedom & Security - Civil Rights; African American universities; African American universities and colleges; College integration; Educational equalization; United States
First sentence: The Brown decision wedded the ethos of the American Creed with America's historical mistreatment of African Americans.
Description: "When racial segregation was the rule in southern schools, all-black universities like Jackson State, Alcorn State, and Mississippi Valley State represented the only opportunities for African Americans to obtain a college education. For that reason, the move toward desegregation triggered by Brown v. Board of Education was a mixed blessing for those committed to preserving the traditions of Historically Black Colleges and Universities."

"In this critique of the liberal perspective on desegregation, Samuels leads readers from the Brown decision to Green v. School Board of New Kent County and on to United States v. Fordice to show how the future of public black universities has been left uncertain at best. For Samuels, economic equality, not segregation, remains the primary obstacle to fully realized citizenship for African Americans. He argues that African Americans' pursuit of equality in higher education can be achieved without defunding programs at these schools and that their funding should be increased in recognition of their role in preserving African American culture."

"Is Separate Unequal? suggests that the application of the American Creed to the African American experience is problematic if the historical and cultural differences between blacks and whites are not taken into account. As new affirmative action rulings from Grutter v. Michigan take effect, Samuels's study offers another view of desegregation to show that the real integration needed is one that integrates tax dollars with the underfunded budgets of HBCUs."--Jacket.