HEAD NURSES: UPWARD AND DOWNWARD INFLUENCE BEHAVIORS AND PERCEPTIONS OF POWER (PERSONAL POWER).
Contributors: University Of Illinois At Chicago, Health Sciences Center.
Published: 1993
Number of pages: 181
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Business Administration, Management.; Women's Studies.
Description: This purpose of this study was to describe the interpersonal influence behaviors used by head nurses with both their superiors and their subordinates and to investigate the relationship between these behaviors and the power bases which head nurses claim that they can use.

Subjects are 180 head nurses from 20 hospitals in northern Illinois. All subjects completed the Influence Behavior Questionnaire, a set of power base scales based on the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power, and a set of demographic questions.

Head nurses were most likely to use rational argument and consultative techniques with both superiors and subordinates. They tended to link rational appeal with the ideals of their associates in order to influence them. They were less likely to fall back on legitimate power or to use ingratiation tactics or coalition-building. The use of reward, pressure, and personal appeal was very unlikely.

Head nurses described power bases which most often included Expert and Referent power, personal power bases. They did not describe strong positional power bases, i.e., legitimate, reward, and coercion. The Expert power base correlated most strongly with the influence tactics chosen by this group which tended to be strongly focused in knowledge. One-fourth of the sample did not see themselves as having any bases of power.

Demographic variables were less significant in prediction of influence behaviors than were the bases of power. However, head nurses from high technology areas, i.e., intensive care and surgery, were more likely to use rational argument and consultative tactics. Younger head nurses were more likely to use knowledge-based tactics while the most- and least-experienced head nurses were less likely to use both rational argument and consultative influence tactics.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05, Section: B, page: 2441.

Thesis (PH.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO, HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, 1993.

School code: 0806.