NURSE AS MORAL HERO: A CASE FOR REQUIRED DISSENT.
Contributors: Indiana University School of Nursing.
Published: 1987
Number of pages: 147
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: The fundamental question asked in this thesis is whether it is philosophically and ethically justified that professional nurses are prevented from practicing autonomously in health care institutions. Preliminary operationalization of the concept of "moral distress"--knowing the right thing to do, but being unable to do it because of institutional constraints--is achieved through the development of a conceptual framework. The working framework is one in which ethical standard and practice conditions conflict, thereby placing the nurse in the position of moral hero: she is required either to act unethically or to act ethically at some degree of risk. The philosophical untenability of the moral hero position is asserted. Using traditional notions of autonomy, authority, teamwork, and professionalism, an argument is made which not only shows common constraints of practice to be illegitimate and unjust, but actually demands dissent on the part of professional nurses placed in the moral hero position. A paradox arises because under the present conditions of practice nurses must act as heroes. Although acting heroically (dissenting) cannot be mandated, it is necessary for all nurses to do so if the requirement for further moral heroism is to be extinguished. An argument justifying required dissent is made on philosophical, professional, and pragmatic grounds. An ideal system for institutional health care delivery which minimizes the need for moral heroism and dissent is outlined. Implications for use of the moral hero framework by nursing leaders, researchers, educators, and ethics writers are given.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 50-03, Section: B.

Thesis (D.N.S.)--INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING, 1987.

School code: 0815.