The exercitation answered, in the assertions following made good against it. 1. That the usurpation pretended by the exercitator is really nousurpation, by anything that he hath said to prove it such. 2. That former oaths in controversie oblige not against obedience to present powers. 3. That obedience is due to powers in possession, though unlawfully enter'd.
Contributors: Gee, Edward, 1613-1660.
Publisher: Printed for John Wright
Published: 1650
Place of publication: London
Language: eng
Notes: In reply to Edward Gee's "An exercitation concerning usurped powers".

Wing: E3865.