Wildland fire effects in silviculturally treated vs. untreated stands of New Mexico and Arizona
By: Douglas S. Cram, Terrell T. Baker, and Jon C. Boren.
Contributors: Baker, Terrell T.; Boren, Jon C., 1965-; Rocky Mountain Research Station (Fort Collins, Colo.)
Series: Research paper RMRS -- RP-55.
Publisher: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
Published: 2006
Place of publication: Fort Collins, CO
Language: eng
Number of pages: 28
Subjects: Forests and forestry -- Fire management -- Arizona.; Forests and forestry -- Fire management -- New Mexico.; Forest fires -- Arizona.; Forest fires -- New Mexico.; Forest management -- Arizona.; Forest management -- New Mexico.
Description: Stand-replacement fires, particularly in ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests, have replaced highfrequency, low-intensity historical fire regimes. We examined whether forest stands treated recently using silvicultural practices would be (1) less susceptible to stand-replacing crownfires, and (2) more ecologically and functionally resilient compared to untreated stands following extreme wildland fire.  Reports detailing wildland fire behavior in treated stands remain largely anecdotal. We compared fire severity indices, fireline intensity (btu/ft/s), stand characteristics including canopy bulk density (kg/m3), and post-fire recovery indices in silviculturally treated vs. untreated forest stands in New Mexico and Arizona. Results indicated fire severity in pine-grassland forests was lowered when surface and aerial fuel loads were reduced. Specifically, as density (stems/ac) and basal area (ft²/ac) decreased and mean tree diameter (in) increased, fire severity and fireline intensity decreased. The more aggressive the treatment (i.e., where the canopy bulk density was reduced), the less susceptible forest stands were to crownfire. However, mechanical treatments where slash was scattered rendered stands susceptible to near stand-replacement type damage when wildfire occurred within 4 years of treatment. On our study sites, mechanical treatment followed by prescribed fire had the greatest impact toward mitigating fire severity (i.e., aerial and surface fuels were reduced). Treated stands were also more ecologically and functionally resilient than untreated forest stands following wildland fire.
Notes: "February 2006."

Includes bibliographical references (p. 14-16).

Also available on the World Wide Web.