Errors in phased array pulse-wave ultrasound velocity estimation systems.
Published: 2004
Language: eng
Number of pages: 120
Description: In the first, it was shown that the classical Doppler effect is actually an artifact and, as a result, spectral broadening in pulse-wave ultrasound velocity estimation differs from the classical approach.Using linear phased array pulse-wave Doppler ultrasound transducers, the measured maximum velocity may be in error and lead to incorrect clinical diagnosis. The primary objective of this thesis was to obtain an improved understanding of pulse-wave Doppler ultrasound systems, with the intention of determining the sources of this error and to correct for it. This was realized in a three-phase approach.The second phase consisted of an experimental investigation to determine the factors governing the estimation error for steady and pulsatile flow in a clinically relevant manner (believed to be the first for pulsatile flow). The apparatus included a tissue mimicking phantom, blood mimicking fluid, and transducer angle and position control. To estimate the maximum velocity, a new SNR independent method was developed to calculate the maximum frequency from an ensemble averaged power spectrum. When optimized for a non-steered beam-flow angle of 60&deg;, the accuracy was found to be better than those previously reported in the literature. It was found that the effect of transducer focal depth, infra-transducer, infra-machine, inter-machine (that was tested) and beam-steering (for steered beam-flow angles less than 65&deg;) did not significantly contribute to maximum velocity estimation errors. Instead, the primary contribution was from the dependence of the maximum velocity on the beam-flow angle.The third phase was the development of the first (to the best of our knowledge) phased array pulse wave ultrasound velocity estimation simulator. The receive gate was shown to be crucial in defining how the scattered signal from each scatterer contributes to the gated received signal. 3D sample volume simulations showed that the receive gate primarily determines the axial shape, while the focusing determines the shape in the lateral and elevation directions.
Notes: Adviser:  R. S. C. Cobbold.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto, 2004.

Electronic version licensed for access by U. of T. users.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-05, Section: B, page: 2559.