The subversive oratory of Andokides
Subtitle: politics, ideology, and decision-making in democratic Athens
By: Anna Missiou.
Series: Cambridge classical studies
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Published: 1992
Place of publication: Cambridge [England]; New York
Language: eng
Number of pages: 216
Subjects: Andocides, ca. 440-ca. 390 B.C. -- Criticism and interpretation; Speeches, addresses, etc., Greek -- History and criticism; Politics and literature -- Greece -- Athens; Social norms in literature; Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Athens (Greece) -- Politics and government
Description: Oratory was a vital element in the Athenian democracy. In this study Anna Missiou analyses the ideological content of the speeches of the crypto-oligarch Andokides (active c.420-390 B.C.). Drawing on modern communication studies, she proposes a contextual and historical approach to oratory rather than one that concentrates on the speaker. She insists that there was a rational as well as an emotional element in the responses of both orator and audience, and that there was a tension between political equality and socio-economic inequality lying at the centre of Athenian democratic society. She suggests that the political ideology of a speaker can be evaluated in the light of his rhetorical techniques. A detailed analysis of Andokides' arguments for peace in On the Peace with the Lakedaimonians reveals that the intense controversy in Athens over the continuation of the war with Sparta in 391 reflected class antagonism among the Athenians. Conventionally the rejection of Andokides' proposals by the Athenian Assembly has been ascribed to irrational crowd-behaviour, an interpretation assuming that the sole purpose of an orator is to sway his audience by persuasion. However, Dr. Missiou argues that the speech was essentially subversive, aimed at spreading pro-Spartan and anti-war feelings rather than persuading the audience to take a particular decision on this occasion. These considerations can lead the reader on to larger issues such as whether Athenian democracy questioned basic aristocratic values and attitudes in domestic and foreign affairs, and whether an orator encouraged or discouraged the participation of the ordinary Athenians in the actual deliberation and decision-making process.
Notes: Includes bibliographical references (p. 183-197) and index.