DETERMINING THE EXTENT TO WHICH INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE REASONING SKILLS ARE PRESENT AT CRITICAL INTERVALS IN A NURSING EDUCATION PROGRAM.
Contributors: Rutgers University.
Published: 1986
Number of pages: 146
Subjects: Education, Sciences.; Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: In the field of cognitive psychology, the area of problem solving has been given a great deal of emphasis. Research in this area has led to focus attention away from the products of solving problems to the process of problem solving. Within this paradigm, two skills that have been identified as important to the problem solving process are induction and deduction.

The purpose of this study is to determine if at critical intervals in a marginally skilled nursing student's career there are any significant differences in inductive and deductive reasoning skills. These skills were measured by four instruments: Diagramming Relationships, Locations Test, Figure Classifications, and Propositional Logic Test (PLT). The inductive and deductive variables, together with background information on the subjects, are used to determine corollary relationships with either success on the nursing licensure exam for recent graduates and gaining admissions in a nursing program for pre-nurses. Moreover, for a limited number of subjects (n = 15), five from each group were tested with a clinical version of the Propositional Logic Test (PLT) to determine if the results recorded in the paper and pencil test support this study.

There are many limitations in the study which restrict its results to the population that participated in it. The results of the study suggest that marginally skilled nursing students develop significantly higher inductive skills with experience. Concomitantly, these same students develop deductive skills over the course of time, however, not with the same robustness as inductive skills.

The clinical results demonstrate that there are students who are unable to answer items on the written version of the PLT, yet manage to correctly answer these same items on the clinical version. This suggests that marginally skilled students may have problem solving skills, however, they are unable to utilize these skills because they apparently cannot internalize problem statements that are not explained to them. This fact has implications on how marginally skilled students learn.

In addition, on the portion of the study involving corollary relationships, the results show that the disjunctive items of the written PLT had a significant corollary relationship with success on the nursing licensure exam and the conjunctive items of the written PLT had a significant corollary relationship with gaining admission in a nursing program.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 47-08, Section: A, page: 2981.

Thesis (ED.D.)--RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY - NEW BRUNSWICK, 1986.

School code: 0190.