AN ANALYSIS OF MORAL JUDGMENT IN REGISTERED NURSES: PRINCIPLED REASONING VERSUS CARING VALUES.
Contributors: Boston College.
Published: 1991
Number of pages: 171
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: The purpose of this study was to analyze moral reasoning in registered nurses from two perspectives: the "traditional" perspective based on the principle of justice and largely derived from the work of Kohlberg; and the alternative perspective, "an ethic of care," based on the concepts of harmony, nonviolence and relationships, and derived from Gilligan's conceptual framework. The Defining Issues Test (DIT) developed by Rest measured the moral judgment scores from the traditional perspective. A new instrument, "Attitudes Towards Nursing Behaviors," developed by the investigator was used to assess the caring perspective.

The stratified random sample (N = 418) was derived from a population of nurses who belonged to the American Nurses' Association from a New England state. All of the male nurses in the state association were sampled; the female nurses were stratified by three educational levels: diploma/associates, baccalaureate, and graduate.

The results in this study found: (1) the mean P-scores (%) was 48.02 and the mean D-score, 29.44; (2) the P and D scores were significantly related to educational level; the mean moral judgment scores increased significantly with additional education; and (3) there were no significant differences in the moral judgment of caring value scores between male and female nurses.

These findings are congruent with earlier research that found formal education, rather than gender as the significant variable in predicting moral reasoning. These findings also challenge the position that there are two alternative moral frameworks operating that are gender predominate, since there were no significant gender differences on either instrument.

Due to the limitations of this study (a new instrument to measure caring values, and a homogeneous nursing population) one cannot generalize that no gender differences exist in moral reasoning, thus future research is warranted. However, this study found that nurses incorporate both justice and caring into their moral reasoning skills. The implications for nursing are to cultivate and harmonize the concepts of justice and care within all nurses to enhance and provide humanistic patient care to all individuals.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-05, Section: B, page: 2497.

Thesis (PH.D.)--BOSTON COLLEGE, 1991.

School code: 0016.