The illiquidity puzzle
Subtitle: theory and evidence from private equity
By: Josh Lerner, Antoinette Marion Sa Schoar
Contributors: Schoar, Antoinette; Harvard Business School. Division of Research
Series: Working paper (Sloan School of Management) -- no. 4378-02; NOM working paper -- no. 02-024; Working paper / Division of Research, Harvard Business School -- 03-038; Working paper (Harvard Business School. Division of Research) -- 03-038
Publisher: Division of Research, Harvard Business School
Published: 2002
Place of publication: Boston]
Language: eng
Number of pages: 37
Subjects: Equity; Mathematical models; Venture capital
Description: This paper presents a theory of liquidity where we explicitly model the liquidity of the security as a choice variable, which enables the manager raising the funds to screen for "deep pocket" investors, i.e., those that have a low likelihood of a liquidity shock. By choosing the degree of illiquidity of the security, the manager can influence the type of investors the firm will attract. The benefit of liquid investors is that they reduce the manager's cost of capital for future fund raising. If inside investors have fewer information asymmetries about the quality of the manager than the outside market, more liquid investors protect the manager from having to return to the outside market, where he would face higher cost of capital due to asymmetric information problems. We test the predictions of our model in the context of the private equity industry. Consistent with the theory, we find that transfer restrictions on investors are less common in later funds organized by the same private equity firm, where information problems are presumably less severe. Contracts involving the close-knit California venture capital community where information on the relative performance of funds are more readily ascertained are less likely to employ many of these provisions as well. Also, private equity partnerships whose investment focus is in industries with longer investment cycles display more transfer constraints. For example, funds focusing on the pharmaceutical industry have more constraints, while those specializing in computing and Internet investments have fewer constraints. Finally, we investigate whether the identity of the investors that invest in a private equity fund is related.
Notes: Includes bibliographical references.

Also available in an electronic version.