PSYCHOSOCIAL VARIABLES AND GENDER AS FACTORS IN WELLNESS PROMOTION.
Contributors: State University of New York at Buffalo.
Published: 1990
Number of pages: 135
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: Although nursing recognizes health as a fundamental element in its metaparadigm, nursing research reflects varying conceptual definitions of health. One predominant conceptualization has been derived from medicine and views health as absence of disease, leading to research in health promotion that emphasizes early detection of disease and illness prevention efforts. An alternative view of health as high level wellness is integrated into Pender's (1987) health promotion model.

This study developed and tested an original model of wellness promotion derived theoretically from Pender's Health Promotion Model and Pollock's conceptualization of health-related hardiness. Independent variables included in the model were gender, interpersonal relationship characteristics, and health-related hardiness. The dependent variable was wellness promotion lifestyle (total and component dimensions: self-actualization, health responsibility, interpersonal support, nutrition, exercise and stress management). The research question was: How do interpersonal relationship characteristics, health-related hardiness and gender relate to wellness promotion behavior? A relationship between the independent variables (interpersonal relationship characteristics (support, reciprocity and conflict), health-related hardiness and gender) and the dependent variable, wellness promotion was hypothesized.

A cross sectional correlational study was implemented with a convenience sample of 180 adult men and women. A written questionnaire contained previously developed and tested instruments. Tilden's Interpersonal Relationship Inventory, Pollock's Health-Related Hardiness Scale and the Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile were utilized. Gender differences were identified in total wellness promotion and in its interpersonal support and nutrition dimensions. Interpersonal reciprocity and social support were significantly correlated with total wellness promotion and with self-actualization, health responsibility, nutrition, interpersonal support and stress management dimensions. Interpersonal conflict was significantly correlated with self-actualization only. Health-related hardiness was significantly correlated with total wellness promotion and with all six wellness dimensions. Results of stepwise multiple regression analysis demonstrated partial support for the proposed model, with 34% of the variance in wellness promotion explained by health-related hardiness and interpersonal reciprocity. Gender, health-related hardiness, and interpersonal relationship characteristics explained 35% of the variance in self-actualization, providing support for the proposed model.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-03, Section: B, page: 1348.

Thesis (D.N.S.)--STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO, 1990.

School code: 0656.