The benefits and pitfalls of strengthening Virginia's open-container laws
By: Kimberly M. Mattingly, Jason S. Beaton
Contributors: Beaton, Jason S.; Virginia Transportation Research Council; Virginia. Department of Transportation
Series: VTRC -- 06-R20
Publisher: Virginia Transportation Research Council
Published: 2006
Place of publication: Charlottesville, Va
Language: eng
Number of pages: 22
Subjects: Federal aid to transportation; Motor vehicles; Law and legislation; Drunk driving; States; Drinking and traffic accidents
Description: This study addressed the conditions on federal highway funding imposed by the federal government in the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) and its successor Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) relating to a state's implementation of a compliant open-container law.  Although SAFETEA-LU amended TEA-21 in a number of ways, it did not change the statutory standard for open-container laws established by TEA-21.  Non-compliant states have a percentage of their highway construction funds diverted to a safety fund.  In this study, the constitutionality of such restrictions was explored and found to be acceptable given similar Supreme Court precedent.  Second, the responses of other states to the federal initiatives were determined and assessed for compliance.  Third, the efficacy of the federal guidelines in terms of their impact on highway safety was explored.  Fourth, Virginia's current open-container law was analyzed with regard to its compliance with the federal mandate.  Virginia's open-container law does not comply with the provisions of TEA-21.  As a result, 3 percent of Virginia's highway construction funds are diverted from highway construction to safety programs.  If Virginia passed a law that satisfied the federal conditions, this transfer would stop.  If Virginia does not pass such a law, it cannot avoid the transfer of more than $16 million pursuant to 23 U.S.C.154 for fiscal year 2006.  An additional benefit of enacting a stricter open-container statute is that such a law could potentially function as a "back up" charge that might be pressed if a driver was suspected to be driving under the influence of alcohol but the violation could not be substantiated in a traffic stop.  However, there is much debate as to the actual effect of TEA-21-compliant open-container laws on reducing the frequency and severity of alcohol-related traffic crashes.
Notes: "February 2006."

Includes bibliographical references.

Final report; July 2005-June 2006.

Also available online via the VTRC website.

Sponsored by Virginia Department of Transportation 76463