Developing and testing a unified school improvement-school effectiveness framework for evaluating complex school improvement initiatives.
Published: 2004
Language: eng
Number of pages: 250
Subjects: School improvement programs -- Evaluation.
Description: This study applies to school improvement processes the research methodology typically used in studying school effectiveness, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of improvement initiatives. It links school improvement and school effectiveness practically as well as theoretically. First, an ideal, unified, school improvement-school effectiveness evaluation (SI-SE) framework is proposed. Using this framework, school improvement programs can be evaluated to determine if they are effective school improvement processes. Since this thesis serves as an evaluation study, however, the framework must be strong enough to elicit reliable and valid information upon which to base program decisions.Nevertheless, in order to illustrate the analyses that are possible given these limitations, the MSIP evaluation data are reanalysed, applying principles of the unified evaluation framework, including the use of multilevel statistical models for data analysis. Three sets of analyses, including hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), are carried out on the existing data. Findings from the HLM analysis help determine the status of the MSIP as an effective school improvement process. Finally, the utility of the unified SI-SE evaluation framework for application beyond the MSIP evaluation is discussed.Second, the Manitoba School Improvement Program (MSIP) evaluation is presented as a case study to test the framework. Comparisons between the unified framework and the MSIP evaluation are made in terms of evaluation design, measurement considerations, and statistical analyses. Examination of the MSIP evaluation through the lens of the unified framework exposes limitations in the school improvement-based evaluation. These limitations centre on the absence of some types of data that are essential in the unified school improvement-school effectiveness evaluation framework, and on the quality of existing data.
Notes: Adviser:  Lorna M. Earl.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto, 2004.

Electronic version licensed for access by U. of T. users.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-05, Section: A, page: 1750.