INFLUENCE TACTICS RELATED TO LEADERSHIP STYLES OF CHIEF NURSE EXECUTIVES (NURSE EXECUTIVES).
Contributors: University Of Illinois At Chicago, Health Sciences Center.
Published: 1992
Number of pages: 82
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Health Sciences, Health Care Management.
Description: A study was conducted to examine the nature of and relationship between the influence tactics and leadership styles of Chief Nurse Executives (CNEs). Data were collected from 46 CNEs and 40 of their immediate subordinates, Associate/Assistant Directors of Nursing (ADNs), from academic health centers about the respondents' perceptions of the use of influence tactics by and leadership styles of the CNEs. ADNs were categorized as Most- or Least-Closely Aligned with their CNEs' management philosophies.

Regardless of the ADNs' alignment with their CNEs' management philosophy, results indicated that ADNs shared similar perceptions of leadership styles, but the ADNs' perceptions of the frequency of use with which certain influence tactics were used differed significantly from those of the CNEs. Selling or Participating were identified as the CNEs' Primary Leadership Style by a majority of CNEs and ADNs. Four of 18 influence tactics were related to particular leadership styles. The relationships between frequency of use of influence tactics and leadership styles with demographic characteristics of the CNEs and ADNs were also examined.

ADNs and CNEs identified the three most frequently used influence tactics as: Consultation, Rational Persuasion and Inspirational Appeals. CNEs reported using Pressure or Exchange the least; ADNs reported Exchange and Coalition as least used. CNEs used Pressure more the longer they remained in their position, and most likely with new ADNs. The longer the ADNs remained in their jobs, the more likely they were to report the use of Personal Appeals by their CNE. Only very short-term and very long-term ADNs reported that their CNE used Legitimation as an influence tactic. On the whole, CNEs reported they used a greater range of influence tactics than the ADNs reported.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 53-05, Section: B, page: 2246.

Thesis (PH.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO, HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, 1992.

School code: 0806.