Marking, enumeration, and size estimation for coho and chinook salmon smolt releases into upper Cook Inlet, Alaska in 1993
By: by Larry R. Peltz and Patricia A. Hansen.
Contributors: Hansen, Patricia A.; Alaska. Division of Sport Fish.
Series: Fishery data series -- no. 94-21.
Publisher: Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish
Published: 1994
Place of publication: Anchorage
Language: eng
Number of pages: 39
Subjects: Coho salmon -- Alaska -- Cook Inlet -- Statistics.; Chinook salmon -- Alaska -- Cook Inlet -- Statistics.; Fishes -- Alaska -- Cook Inlet -- Statistics.; Fish populations -- Alaska -- Cook Inlet -- Statistics.
Genres: Statistics.
Description: Southcentral Alaska contains the majority of the state's human population and receives the vast majority of the state's fishing pressure, both of which are increasing (Mills 1993). To meet the growing demand on the sport fishery resource, hatchery reared chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch smolt have been stocked in numerous locations throughout Southcentral Alaska to improve or create terminal sport fisheries. Marking and collection of release data at the Big Lake, Elmendorf, and Fort Richardson hatcheries were standardized for each of the stocking projects in 1993. This report presents the results of the 1993 marking program. In addition, results from the comparison of three different smolt enumeration techniques are examined and discussed. The size composition of each release group is also presented and discussed. Over 390,000 coho and chinook salmon smolt for release at 10 locations in Cook Inlet were marked with an adipose finclip and a coded wire tag. Tag retention ranged from 92.3% to 98.8%. Comparison of the three smolt enumeration techniques revealed three interesting trends. First, in most instances the mark-recapture estimate was the lowest of the three and the hatchery inventory estimate was the highest of the three. Second, the measured variability associated with the mark-recapture estimate was usually the smallest. Third, the difference between the mark-recapture estimate and the hatchery inventory estimate was similar for all groups.
Notes: "September 1994."

"Literature cited": p. 38-39.

Also issued online.