RADICAL WOMEN IN ACADEMIA: A FEMINIST INTERPRETIVE STUDY OF NURSES.
Contributors: Georgia State University.
Published: 1993
Number of pages: 166
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Women's Studies.
Description: The purpose of this study was to explore the nature of what it means to be a radical woman in nursing academia. The focus was to discover and make visible the common practices and shared meanings of radical nurse academicians, as well as their unique and individual experiences and perspectives. An examination of the nature of radical women in nursing academia contributes to an understanding of how we can create and sustain emancipatory stances in nursing education.

A feminist methodology that emphasized the importance of women's lives and experiences, reflexivity, the reciprocal relationship between researcher and participants, and the context-dependence of language and experience was used to guide the inquiry. Open-ended interviews with 16 nurse academicians, as well as my field notes, journal entries, and self-reflexive dialogue constituted the data for the study.

Participants were identified by my personal knowledge of radical nurses' publications or professional presentations, by recommendations from my professional colleagues, and from other participants. Four African American women, one Hispanic woman, and 12 European American women participated in the study. The average age of participants was 49 years, with a range of 37 to 62 years. Participants represented twelve institutions.

Data analysis took place using an adapted version of the hermeneutic method described by Diekelmann, Allen, and Tanner (1989). Based on this method for data analysis, I developed a research team composed of two other doctoral students and other experts in hermeneutic analysis. The research team assisted me in the interpretation of the transcribed interviews and contributed to the rigor of the study. Criteria for rigor as developed by Hall and Stevens (1991) were used to evaluate the process and outcomes of the inquiry. These criteria addressed the issues of dependability and adequacy.

Four patterns relating to radicality were identified in the participants' interviews: (a) Am I Radical?, (b) Radical as a Way of Being, (c) The Context of Being Radical, and (d) What Sustains Me? Relational themes and subthemes were also identified in each of the four patterns. Recommendations for generating theory, developing and conducting research, and teaching in nursing education are made based on the findings in this study.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05, Section: B, page: 2442.

Thesis (PH.D.)--GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 1993.

School code: 0079.