The effect of taxes on royalties and the migration of intangible assets abroad
By: John H. Mutti, Harry Grubert.
Contributors: Grubert, Harry.; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Series: NBER working paper series -- no. 13248.; Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research) -- working paper no. 13248.
Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research
Published: 2007
Place of publication: Cambridge, Mass
Language: eng
Number of pages: 40
Subjects: International business enterprises -- Taxation -- Government policy -- United States; Research, Industrial -- Taxation -- Government policy -- United States; Intangible property -- United States -- Econometric models
Description: Migration of intangible assets from the United States to foreign countries has become easier due to the ability of U.S. firms to create hybrid entities in their affiliates abroad and to reach favorable cost sharing agreements with them. This strategy was particularly encouraged by the U.S. adoption of "check-the-box" regulations in 1997. Rather than receive royalties from affiliates abroad, US parent firms have an incentive to retain abroad in low-tax countries a greater share of the return to their US R&D. Evidence from several sources for years that span the 1997 policy change indicate a significant response by US corporations in utilizing this strategy. BEA data indicate affiliate earnings and profits grew more rapidly than royalty payments to US parents. Payments to U.S. parents for technical services rose even faster, as would be called for under cost sharing agreements. Regression analysis of affiliate data shows that parent R&D was a more important determinant of royalty payments to U.S. parents than it was for affiliate earnings and profits in 1996, but by 2002 it played a larger role in earnings and profits than in royalties. Cost sharing payments from affiliates in Ireland and from pure tax havens (Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, and Luxembourg) are particularly significant, both economically and statistically.
Notes: "July 2007."

Includes bibliographical references (p. 29-30).

Also available in PDF from the NBER world wide web site (www.nber.org).