Political contribution caps and lobby formation
Subtitle: theory and evidence
By: Allan Drazen, Nuno Lamao, Thomas Stratman.
Contributors: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Series: NBER working paper series ;; working paper 10928; Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research : Online) ;; working paper no. 10928.
Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research
Published: 2004
Place of publication: Cambridge, MA
Language: eng
Format: Electronic resource
Subjects: Campaign funds.; Political action committees.
Description: "The perceived importance of "special interest group" money in election campaigns motivates widespread use of caps on allowable contributions.  We present a bargaining model in which putting a cap that is not too stringent on the size of the contribution a lobby can make improves its bargaining position relative to the politician, thus increasing the payoff from lobbying.  Such a cap will therefore increase the equilibrium number of lobbies when lobby formation is endogenous.  Caps may then also increase total contributions from all lobbies, increase politically motivated government spending, and lower social welfare.  We present empirical evidence from U.S. states consistent with the predictions of the model.  We find a positive effect on the number of PACs formed from enacting laws constraining PAC contributions.  Moreover, the estimated effect is nonlinear, as predicted by the theoretical model.  Very stringent caps reduce the number of PACs, but as the cap increases above a threshold level, the effect becomes positive.  Contribution caps in the majority of US states are above this threshold"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Notes: Also available in print.
Includes bibliographical references.
Title from PDF file as viewed on 1/13/2005.
System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.