FACULTY EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL COMPETENCE OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY STUDENTS (MIDWIFERY).
Contributors: George Mason University.
Published: 1994
Number of pages: 151
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Health Sciences, Education.
Description: This study describes faculty evaluation of the clinical competence of nurse-midwifery students. Using a framework developed by Staropoli and Waltz (1978), evaluation inputs, operations, and outputs pertinent to nurse-midwifery clinical education and its evaluation were identified. An investigator designed questionnaire was mailed to all known nurse-midwifery program directors and faculty in the United States. An overall response rate of 79% was attained. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyze the data.

Respondents $(N = 132)$ represented all nurse-midwifery programs accredited by the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) at the time of the study. On average respondents reported 7.9 years of teaching experience, with program directors reporting more teaching experience than their faculty colleagues and more formal educational preparation for clinical evaluation. Twenty-three percent of respondents acknowledged having no particular preparation for clinical teaching and evaluation.

The principle results of the study indicate that respondents regarded the prior nursing experience of students as important, citing ease of transition to the nurse-midwifery role. Further, modular teaching was the most frequent teaching method reported. All nurse-midwifery programs measure the affective skills of students, and most take patient complexity into account when evaluating students. Most respondents consider student self-evaluation to be an important and valid tool in the clinical evaluation of nurse-midwifery students. Clinical students are evaluated frequently and feedback is provided to students regularly, in writing and verbally. Most respondents reported using clinical objectives that are more specific than the ACNM Core Competencies. When asked to identify three most important and three unacceptable behaviors in student nurse-midwives, respondents most often mentioned items categorized as safety issues.

Future research should address the use of preceptors and their preparation for teaching. A content analysis of existing clinical performance evaluation tools in nurse-midwifery education should be performed. Further research should look to qualitative methods to discover how nurse-midwifery faculty measure intangible behaviors that lead to caring, competent practitioners.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-03, Section: B, page: 0821.

Thesis (PH.D.)--GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY, 1994.

School code: 0883.