Fragmentum Petronii ex Bibliothecae Sti. Galli antiquissimo mss. excerptum, nunc primum in lucem editum. Gallice vertit ac notis perpetuis illustravit Lallemandus, S. Theologiæ Doctor
Publisher: Didot
Published: 1800
Place of publication: Paris
Language: lat
Number of pages: 90
Description: <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:11.5pt;">8vo. f. [1] (blank), pp. [5], 6-75. Signatures: A-E8. Contemporary polished calf gilt. Fragment in Latin, with introduction and notes in French. Shelf mark of Sir Thomas Phillipps’s Middle Hill library on front pastedown.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:11.5pt;"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:11.5pt;">The rare first edition of Marchena’s highly successful hoax-discovery, at St Gall, of manuscripts providing connective links in the fragmentary text of Petronius. A prolific author, journalist, and confirmed revolutionary, José Marchena Ruiz y Cueto (1768-1821, writing here as the imaginary ‘Lallemandus’) fled the Spanish Inquisition in 1792, and was expelled from France in 1799, leaving this little volume to be printed at Paris by Didot. After following the fortunes of the Bonapartists, he returned to France, where he translated Montesquieu, Rousseau, Voltaire and Volnay into Spanish, along the way forging fragments of Catullus (1806). He returned to Spain only in 1820 and died at Madrid the following year. While classicists were well prepared for Petronian forgeries by the long-17th-century controversies over the (genuine) Tau fragment of "Trimalchio's Feast," and the (spurious) Belgrade or Nodot fragments, Marchena's inventions proved both persuasive, for a limited time, and enduringly useful, if only as intuitively ingenious speculations about the missing text. As such they have been incorporated (with appropriate cautions) </span><font face="Helvetica, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:15.3333px;">into many modern editions of the "Satyricon," and Marchena's little book itself has been reprinted (1865), and in recent years studied (by Alexander Smarius, Amsterdam, 1996, see Bib# 4103075/Fr# 1469 in this collection) and fully edited (by Joaquin Alvarez Barrientos, Seville, 2007, Bib# 4103074/Fr# 1468).</span></font><br /></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://catalyst.library.jhu.edu/permalink/01JHU_INST/t3c16/alma991040481729707861" rel="nofollow">Click here to view the Johns Hopkins University catalog record.</a></span></span></p>