DAY AND EVENING STAFFS' PERCEPTIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPECTATIONS FOR HUMANIZED NURSING CARE: A STUDY OF SHIFT DIFFERENCES IN A STATE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL.
Contributors: Temple University.
Published: 1994
Number of pages: 163
Subjects: Sociology, Social Structure and Development.; Psychology, Social.; Health Sciences, Nursing.; Health Sciences, Mental Health.
Description: When nursing shift staffs do not share common goals, treatment continuity is disrupted and the humanizing goals of the therapeutic community cannot be maintained. Consistent goals are most important during the active day and evening shifts, yet the staffs on these shifts often disagree over treatment issues.

Institutional forces encouraging incompatible staff goals on these shifts are proposed in the literature. This study confirms the existence of these forces in the research setting, and interprets shift conflicts as the inevitable result of day and evening staffs' differing perceptions of their expected roles.

This study assessed expected shift roles by asking 63 day and evening nursing-care workers to respond to a modified Ward Atmosphere Scale-Ideal Form (WAS-I) and three narrative questions about their perceptions of the administration's "ideal" ward on their shifts.

Mean shift WAS-I subscale scores were obtained and compared in order to see which shift's ideal (expected) behaviors encouraged the 10 WAS-I social-environmental dimensions. Each social-environmental dimension was defined as a humanizing-dehumanizing continuum by reviewing concepts of humanized health care in the literature; this permitted WAS-I subscale comparisons between shifts to be to placed in some meaningful context.

The results indicated that the expected evening shift goals are inconsistent with the more humanizing goals expected by the day shift on seven of the WAS-I dimensions. Shift differences on two dimensions were not significant but were in the predicted direction, and one dimension could not be interpreted. Similar results were obtained with the narrative data.

In summary, this study did not judge the actions or attitudes of workers. Staff defensiveness was diffused by focusing on administrative responsibilities and institutional realities. As such, shift differences were described as an inevitable institutional problem to be solved cooperatively, and not as evidence of any shifts' indifference. The goal of this research was to demonstrate that conflict is created and maintained as a consequence of staffs' efforts to perform their jobs well, pointing to the need for an administrative commitment to recognize and value behaviors on all shifts which humanize the psychiatric setting.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-04, Section: A, page: 1120.

Thesis (PH.D.)--TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, 1994.

School code: 0225.