Development of an oral health-related quality of life measure for the Malaysian adults population
Subtitle: cross-cultural adaptation of the Oral Health Impact Profile.
Published: 2004
Language: eng
Number of pages: 208
Description: The main aim of this project was to develop an OHRQoL measure for the Malaysian adult population aged 18 and above by adapting the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). It also aimed to compare two methods (frequency and regression) of developing a short form of the measure, to provide preliminary data on the impact of oral conditions on the quality of life of the adult population in Malaysia, and to compare these impacts between Malaysian and Canadian population aged 50 and above.The adaptation of this measure was based on the framework proposed by Herdman et al (1998). The OHIP was translated into the Malay language using a forward-backward translation technique. Thirty-six patients were interviewed to assess the conceptual equivalence and relevancy of each item. The adapted OHIP---L-OHIP(M)---contains 45 items. This questionnaire was pre-tested on 20 patients. A total of 171 respondents completed the short form [S-OHIP(M)] to assess the response format. The five-point frequency Likert scale could be used for Malaysian population.The preliminary results revealed that a substantial proportion of the sample included in this study experienced frequent psychological impacts associated with their oral conditions. The Malaysian population aged 50 and above had slightly higher impacts than Canadian population. However, the pattern of impacts was similar, where physical consequences were most affected and social aspects were the least affected.Both short forms (frequency and regression) performed equally well when tested for discriminative validity. However, the responsiveness of these measures was not tested in this present study. This could be one of the future research areas to determine which version will be superior in terms of detecting change.Field-testing was conducted in order to assess the suitability of two modes of administration (mail and interview) and to establish the psychometric properties of both the L-OHIP(M) and the S-OHIP(M).Both versions [L-OHIP(M) and S-OHIP(M)] were found to be valid and reliable. However, this study only provides initial evidence for the reliability and validity of these measures. Further study is recommended to collect more evidence to support the validity and reliability of these measures.
Notes: Adviser:  David Locker.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto, 2004.

Electronic version licensed for access by U. of T. users.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-05, Section: B, page: 2320.