Defense infrastructure
Subtitle: the Army needs to establish priorities, goals, and performance measures for its Arsenal Support Program Initiative
By: [Brian J. Lepore]
Contributors: United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office
Published: 2009
Place of publication: Washington, DC
Language: eng
Format: [electronic resource] :
Number of pages: 28
Subjects: Ordnance facilities; Management; Evaluation; Arsenals; United States. Army; United States
Other titles: Army needs to establish priorities, goals, and performance measures for its Arsenal Support Program Initiative
Description: The Army has three government-owned and operated manufacturing arsenals that it considers vital to the Department of Defense's (DOD) industrial base because they provide products or services that are either unavailable from private industry or ensure a ready and controlled source of technical competence and resources in case of national defense contingencies or other emergencies. During the defense drawdown of the 1990s, the manufacturing arsenals were struggling from a diminishing and fluctuating workload, high product costs, significant reductions in force, and a fear that their core skills were being lost. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 authorized the Arsenal Support Program Initiative (ASPI), as a demonstration program designed to help maintain the viability of the Army's manufacturing arsenals. Our objective for this review was to determine the extent to which the Army has addressed the intended purposes set forth in the ASPI authorizing legislation. Additionally, in response to congressional interest, we have provided information in enclosure 2 of this report that discusses other available authorities that the Army uses or could use to improve the viability of its manufacturing arsenals. In response to direction by the conferees to conduct a business case analysis that examines the cost, return on investment, and economic impact of the ASPI program, the Congressional Budget Office expects to submit its report later this year. Accordingly, our review did not address those aspects of the ASPI program.
Notes: Title from p.1 caption title screen (GAO, viewed Jan. 8, 2010).

"November 5, 2009."

"GAO-10-167R."

Includes bibliographical references.