HELPING PROFESSIONS' STUDENT AND FACULTY BELIEFS ABOUT SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REACTIONS TO A UNIVERSITY POLICY.
Contributors: University of Tulsa.
Published: 1994
Number of pages: 137
Subjects: Education, Administration.; Education, Higher.; Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: While universities embrace the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act Policy, an increase in alcohol and substance-related incidences are being reported among college students in American society. It could be argued that current substance abuse policies are ineffective. To determine the usefulness of alternative strategies, the assumptions of existing policies must be examined, and the interpretation of and compliance with current strategies must be reviewed.

Current university policies are built on only partial understanding of the problem. While the strategies are relatively correct, they are imprecise in detail. The confusion of detail is related to a limited understanding of what people believe about alcohol and substance abuse, how policy is implemented, and what values are honored in academic environments. The failure to incorporate the same beliefs and honor the values of those implementing the policy may render the strategy ineffective.

The assumption of this qualitative study is that the underlying beliefs that a person holds about substance abuse influences that person's use of a policy. The purposes of this study are to determine how the students and faculty of helping professions resolve substance abuse issues in a university environment and to identify how their beliefs influence reactions to university policy.

University policy was analyzed, and thirty-three semi-structured interviews were conducted. Those interviewed were nursing and teaching students, and their faculty and administrators. Findings of the study are that university policies are designed with three approaches: prevention, control, and punitive strategies. Nursing and teaching students' and faculty beliefs are consistent with preventive and punitive strategies. Inconsistencies relate to how strategies are implemented, and lack of enforcement of control strategies.

Two conclusions are drawn from the study: (1) Policy should take into account the beliefs of those affected, and clear guidelines should be established that provide help for those willing to accept it and punishment for those who do not adhere to the standards; (2) University policies on social issues must be developed with an understanding of the fundamental values of various disciplines in the campus community. This study has implications for both policy development and implementation.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-11, Section: A, page: 3366.

Thesis (PH.D.)--THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA, 1994.

School code: 0236.