INTERDISCIPLINARY DIFFUSION OF NUTRITION DIRECTIVES: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF LITERATURE IN MEDICINE, NURSING, NUTRITION/DIETETICS, AND HEALTH EDUCATION.
Contributors: Kent State University.
Published: 1995
Number of pages: 206
Subjects: Education, Health.; Health Sciences, Education.; Health Sciences, Nutrition.; Library Science.
Description: Nutrition is important to one's long-term health. Attention to better nutrition can improve nutritional status and subsequent health status. Multidisciplinary work has resulted in four major sources of nutritional recommendations, guidelines, and objectives. Primary care providers in medicine, nursing, nutrition/dietetics, and health education have been identified as being responsible for nutrition assessment and counseling as part of the overall process of diffusing these four sources to people. The professional journal literature of these four fields plays an integral role as a source of knowledge for primary care providers. Consistency and adequacy of knowledge about nutrition in professional journals are important to ensure that consumers receive consistent and adequate knowledge about nutrition from primary care providers.

The purpose of this study was to describe, analyze, and compare the status of professional nutrition literature in the fields of medicine, nursing, nutrition/dietetics, and health education.

Diffusion Theory was used as a framework to conduct a descriptive, retrospective, bibliometric analysis. A sample of nutrition articles was selected from general, high-circulation, professional journals representative of one of the four fields published from January, 1990 through December, 1994. A coding form developed for this study was used to analyze thirteen article characteristics, four sources of recommendations, guidelines, and objectives, and the journals cited by the articles.

Statistical analyses showed much diversity in article characteristics. The majority of recommendations, guidelines, and objectives were diffused across the literature of the four fields. Overall, the four sources did not impact the literature, did not impact the authors, and were not a focus of the articles. The results did not show strong evidence of interdisciplinary endeavors in the area of nutrition.

These results: (a) substantiate the complex and multifaceted nature of nutrition and the journals themselves, (b) show it is difficult for a provider to get adequate and consistent knowledge about nutrition from the professional journals in their own field, and (c) suggest professionals expand their journal reading habits to include journals outside their own field.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-12, Section: A, page: 4666.

Thesis (PH.D.)--KENT STATE UNIVERSITY, 1995.

School code: 0101.