Small city transit
By: Transportation Systems Center
Contributors: United States. Urban Mass Transportation Administration
Series: Report - Transportation Systems Center ; no. DOT-TSC-UMTA-76-5
Publisher: U. S. Dept. of Transportation; Available through the National Technical Information Service
Published: 1976
Place of publication: Washington; Springfield, Va
Language: eng
Number of pages: 15
Subjects: Personal rapid transit
Notes: PB 251-501 to PB 251-515.

Report no. UMTA-MA-006-00049-76-1/15.

Final report, sponsored by U. S. Urban Mass Transportation Administration.
Table of contents: title: No.1. Small city transit characteristics; an overview.; title: No.2. Amherst, Mass.; Free-fare,student operated transit in a university community.; title: No.3. Ann Arbor, Mich.; Pilot dial-a-ride project in a sector of the city.; title: No.4. Bremerton, Wash.; Privately operated subscription bus service to an industrial site.; title: No.5. Chapel Hill, N. C.; Public transit serving a university and town.; title: No.6. East Chicago, Ind.; Free-fare transit in a high density, industrialized area.; title: No.7. El Cajon, Calif.; City-wide shared-ride taxi service.; title: No.8. Eugene/Springfield, Ore.; Extensive county-wide transit coverage.; title: (cont.) No.9. Evansville, Ind.; A low subsidy transit service.; title: No.10. Merced, Calif.; Dial-a-ride transit in an agricultural community.; title: No.11. Merrill, Wis.; Point deviation service in a rural community.; title: No.12. Sudbury, Mass.; A short-lived suburban transit service.; title: No.13. Westport, Conn.; Comprehensive transit service in an affluent suburban community.; title: No.14. Xenia, Ohio.; Transit service for a rebuilding community.; title: No.15. Summary of state aid programs.