Science, school science, and school
Subtitle: looking at science learning in classrooms from the perspective of Basil Berstein's theory of the structure of pedagogic discourse
By: Ralph Ian Campbell
Contributors: Harvard University. Graduate School of Education
Published: 2011
Language: eng
Number of pages: 166
Description: This analytic paper asks one question: How does Basil Bernstein's concept of the structure of pedagogic discourse (SPD) contribute to our understanding of the role of teacher-student interactions in science learning in the classroom? Applying Bernstein's theory of the SPD to an analysis of current research in science education explores the structure of Bernstein's theory as a tool for understanding the challenges and questions related to current concerns about classroom science learning. This analysis applies Bernstein's theory of the SPD as a heuristic through a secondary reading of selected research from the past fifteen years and prompts further consideration of Bernstein's ideas. This leads to a reevaluation of the categories of regulative discourse (RD) and instructional discourse (ID) as structures that frame learning environments and the dynamics of student-teacher interactions, which determine learning outcomes.

The SPD becomes a simple but flexible heuristic, offering a useful deconstruction of teaching and learning dynamics in three different classroom environments. Understanding the framing interactions of RD and ID provides perspectives on the balance of agency and expectation, suggesting some causal explanations for the student learning outcomes described by the authors. On one hand, forms of open inquiry and student-driven instruction may lack the structure to ensure the appropriation of desired forms of scientific thinking. On the other hand, well-designed pathways towards the understanding of fundamental concepts in science may lack the forms of more open-ended inquiry that develop transferable understanding. Important ideas emerge about the complex dynamics of learning communities, the materials of learning, and the dynamic role of the teacher as facilitator and expert. Simultaneously, the SPD as a flexible heuristic proves ambiguous, prompting a reevaluation of Bernstein's organization of RD and ID. The hierarchical structure of pedagogic discourse becomes a problematic distinction. Regulative discourse is often more instructional and instructional discourse more instrumental in shaping roles and relationships within the learning community. This analysis suggests an agenda for future classroom research and the education of teachers, capitalizing on the SPD as heuristic and reevaluating the ways that social dynamics and structures for domain-specific learning interact in the realization of classroom learning.
Notes: Vita.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Harvard Graduate School of Education, 2011.

Includes bibliographic references (leaves 158-165).