Animal Sacrifice and Religious Freedom
Subtitle: Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
Published: March 2004
Language: eng
Format: Hardcover
Number of pages: 208
ISBN-13: 9780700613021
Subjects: Constitutional & administrative law; Legal status, laws, etc; Hialeah (Fla.); Constitutional; Religious minorities; Legal Reference / Law Profession; Law; USA; Courts - Supreme Court; Legal History; Trials, litigation, etc; Church of the Lukumi Babalu Ay; Legal status, laws, etc; Christian Rituals & Practice - General; United States; Animal sacrifice; Freedom of religion; Law and legislation
Description: "The Santeria religion of Cuba--the Way of the Saints--mixes West African Yoruba culture with Catholicism. Similar to Haitian voodoo, Santeria has long practiced animal sacrifice in certain rites. But when Cuban immigrants brought those rituals to Florida, local authorities were suddenly confronted with a controversial situation that pitted the regulation of public health and morality against religious freedom. After Ernesto Pichardo established a Santeria church in Hialeah in the 1980s, the city of Hialeah responded by passing ordinances banning ritual animal sacrifice. Although on the surface those ordinances seemed general in intent, they were clearly aimed at Pichardo's church. When Pichardo subsequently sued the city, a federal court ruled in the latter's favor, in effect privileging the regulation of public health and morality over the church's free exercise of its religion. The U.S. Supreme Court heard Pichardo's appeal in 1993 and unanimously decided that the city had overstepped its bounds in targeting this particular religious group; however, the court was sharply divided regarding the basis of its decision. Three concurring opinions registered distinctly different views of the First Amendment, the limits of government regulation, and the religious freedom of minorities. In the end, the nine justices collectively concluded that freedom of religious belief was absolute while the freedom to practice the tenets of any faith were subject to non-discriminatory local regulations."--Publisher's description.