CARING FOR A SERIOUSLY MENTALLY ILL ADULT FAMILY MEMBER: COPING STRENGTHS AND STRATEGIES OF BLACK FAMILY CAREGIVERS (RURAL, STRESS).
Contributors: University of Virginia.
Published: 1995
Number of pages: 165
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies.; Health Sciences, Mental Health.; Sociology, Individual and Family Studies.; Psychology, Social.
Description: This investigation was designed to delineate the identified family resources, life stressors, perceptions of seriousness of life stressors, perceptions of seriousness of crises event(s), family resources, and family coping behaviors, and describe the relationships among these variables, for southern rural black families caring for an adult seriously mentally ill family member. Coping behaviors are developed over time as a result of continuous transaction between the family's appraisal of it's resources and perceptions of the severity of life stressors (family meaning) (McCubbin & Thompson, 1987). Findings from the literature review suggest that black families use different coping strategies than white families. An aim of this research was to describe strengths and strategies identified by rural black families caring for a seriously mentally ill member.

Face-to-face interviews with two family caregivers of 50 black families caring for a seriously mentally ill adult family member were completed. The modified Double ABCX Model of Family adaptation to stress (McCubbin & Thompson, 1987) guided this investigation. Coping was measured by the Family Crisis Oriented Personal Scales (F-COPES), family resources by the Family Inventory of Resources for Management (FIRM), family life stressors by the Family Inventory of Life Events and Changes (FILE), and perceptions of life stressors and crises event(s) by visual analog scales paired with FILE items and subscales. Demographic information on family caregivers and consumer members was also collected.

Subjects in this investigation reported a higher perception of family resources than the norming sample, to include, family strengths--reflecting personal family system and social support resources, and financial well-being--reflecting perceived family financial efficacy. Family stressors were not adequately identified by the FILE by subjects of this study. Difficulty in managing a chronically ill or disabled member emerged as the item perceived most serious of life stressors, along with family member emotional problems and monetary expense strains. Perception of seriousness of consumer psychotic episodes was most highly correlated with perception of seriousness of intra-family strains, disruption of total family life, work strains, and illness and other family care strains.

The following coping behaviors emerged as most significant: reframing coping--the capability to redefine stressful events in order to make them more manageable; and passive coping--the ability to accept problematic issues minimizing reactivity.

Significant relationships emerged among perceptions of stressors and crises event(s), family resources, and coping strategies. Financial resources were of major concern, while family strengths coping strategies were most prominent. Family resources emerged as the single predictor of total coping.

The low reliability and validity of the FILE in this investigation demonstrates a lack of fit of the modified Double ABCX Model for this population of rural, impoverished black families caring for a seriously mentally ill member. The stressful life events of concern for this population were not identified by the FILE, possibly due to lack of instrument validity, sample size and/or composition, impact of the mental illness situation, or unidentified factors. It is recommended that a more culturally and ecologically valid instrument be developed to investigate rural black families caring for seriously mentally ill members.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04, Section: B, page: 1940.

Thesis (PH.D.)--UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, 1995.

School code: 0246.