wrong side(s) of the tracks
Subtitle: estimating the causal effects of racial segregation on city outcomes
By: Elizabeth Oltmans Ananat.
Contributors: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Series: NBER working paper series -- no. 13343.; Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research) -- working paper no. 13343.
Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research
Published: 2007
Place of publication: Cambridge, Mass
Language: eng
Number of pages: 66
Subjects: Segregation -- United States; Cities and towns -- United States -- Econometric models; Sociology, Urban -- United States; Human geography
Description: At the metropolitan level there is a striking negative correlation between residential racial segregation and population characteristics -- particularly for black residents -- but it is widely recognized that this correlation may not be causal. This paper provides a novel test of the causal relationship between segregation and population outcomes by exploiting the arrangements of railroad tracks in the 19th century to isolate plausibly exogenous variation in cities' susceptibility to segregation. I show that, conditional on miles of railroad track laid, the extent to which track configurations physically subdivided cities strongly predicts the level of segregation that ensued after the Great Migration of African-Americans to northern and western cities in the 20th century. At the start of the Great Migration, though, track configurations were uncorrelated with racial concentration, ethnic dispersion, income, industry, education, and population, indicating that reverse causality is unlikely. Instrumental variables estimates demonstrate that segregation leads to lower incomes and lower education among blacks. For whites, there is a mix of positive and negative effects: segregation decreases the probability of being a college graduate or a high earner, but also decreases the probability of being poor or unemployed. Segregation could generate these effects either by affecting human capital acquisition of residents of different races and socio-economic groups ('production') or by inducing sorting by race and SES into different cities ('selection'). This paper provides evidence that is most consistent with a combination of both production and selection.
Notes: "August 2007"

Includes bibliographical references (p. 48-50).

Also available in PDF from the NBER world wide web site (www.nber.org).