Statistical bias in newspaper reporting on campaign finance
By: [by] Stephen Ansolabehere, Erik C. Snowberg [and] James M. Snyder, Jr
Contributors: Snowberg, Erik C.; Snyder, James M.; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics
Series: Working paper series / Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics -- working paper 03-36; Working paper (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics) -- no. 03-36.
Publisher: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics
Published: 2003
Place of publication: Cambridge, MA
Language: eng
Number of pages: 20
Description: This paper examines evidence of statistical bias in newspaper reporting on campaign finance. We compile data on all dollar amounts for campaign expenditures, contributions, and receipts reported in the five largest circulation newspapers in the United States from 1996 to 2000. We then compare these figures to the universe of campaign expenditures, contributions and receipts, as recorded by the Federal Election Commission. The figures reported in newspaper accounts exceed the average expenditure and contribution by as much as eight fold. Press reporting also focuses excessively on corporations contributions and soft money, rather than on the more common types of donors - individual - and types of contributions - hard money. We further find that these biases are reflected in public perceptions of money in elections. Keywords: campaign finance, news, media, elections. JEL Classifications: D72, D78, L82.
Notes: "October 31, 2003."

Includes bibliographical references (p. 20).

Abstract in HTML and working paper for download in PDF available via World Wide Web at the Social Science Research Network.