2010 resubmission of the U.S.-Russia nuclear cooperation agreement
Subtitle: further actions needed by State and other agencies to improve the review of the Classified Nuclear Proliferation Assessment
By: [Gene Aloise]
Contributors: Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana; Markey, Edward J.; United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office
Published: 2010
Place of publication: Washington, DC
Language: eng
Format: [electronic resource] :
Number of pages: 14
Subjects: Rules and practice; Evaluation; Nuclear energy; Research; International cooperation; United States. Department of State; United States
Other titles: 2010 resubmission of the United States Russia nuclear cooperation agreement :
Description: On May 10, 2010, the President resubmitted to Congress a proposed Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation for Cooperation in the Field of Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy (henceforth referred to as the U.S.-Russia nuclear cooperation agreement or the agreement) in accordance with the review requirements established under section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (AEA), as amended. The proposed agreement with Russia would, among other things, establish the legal basis for the Department of Energy (DOE) to work with Russia on large-scale development of nuclear energy. The Department of State (State) is responsible for negotiating any proposed agreement, with the technical assistance and concurrence of DOE. State must consult with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). It is State's consistent practice to send the proposed agreement and accompanying documents to the Department of Defense (DOD) for review. This report responds to congressional request that we assess the review process for the 2010 submission of the U.S.-Russia nuclear cooperation agreement. Our objectives were to assess the extent to which (1) agencies reported having adequate time to review the Nuclear Proliferation Assessment Statement (NPAS) and classified annexes, (2) State implemented our recommendations to develop written procedures and clarify agency roles for the 2010 review process, and (3) additional actions may be required to strengthen the review process for future nuclear cooperation agreements.
Notes: Title from subject line of title screen (GAO, viewed Feb. 22, 2011).

"September 21, 2010."

Letter from Gene Aloise to House of Representative requesters Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Edward J. Markey.

"GAO-10-1039R."

Includes bibliographical references.