Measuring welfare in restructured electricity markets
By: Erin T. Mansur
Contributors: National Bureau of Economic Research
Series: NBER working paper series -- working paper 13509; Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research : Online) -- working paper no. 13509.
Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research
Published: 2007
Place of publication: Cambridge, MA
Language: eng
Format: [electronic resource] /
Description: "Restructuring electricity markets has enabled wholesalers to exercise market power.  Using a common method of measuring competitive behavior in these markets, several studies have found substantial inefficiencies.  This method overstates actual welfare loss by ignoring production constraints that result in non-convex costs.  I develop an alternative method that accounts for these constraints and apply it to the Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Maryland market.  For the summer following restructuring, the common method implies that market imperfections resulted in considerable welfare loss, with actual production costs exceeding the competitive model's estimates by 13 to 21 percent.  In contrast, my method finds that actual costs were only between three and eight percent above the competitive levels.  In particular, it is the fringe firms whose costs increase, while strategic firms reduce production and costs"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Notes: Title from PDF file as viewed on 11/1/2007.

Includes bibliographical references.

Also available in print.

System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Mode of access: World Wide Web.