What determines giving to Hurricane Katrina victims?
Subtitle: experimental evidence on income, race, and fairness
By: Christina M. Fong, Erzo F.P. Luttmer.
Contributors: Luttmer, Erzo F. P.; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Series: NBER working paper series -- working paper 13219.; Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research) -- working paper no. 13219.
Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research; John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
Published: 2007
Place of publication: Cambridge, Mass
Language: eng
Number of pages: 53
Subjects: Hurricane Katrina, 2005 -- Economic aspects; Hurricane Katrina, 2005 -- Charitable contributions -- Mathematical models; Disaster victims -- Charitable contributions -- Mathematical models
Description: We investigate determinants of private and public generosity to Katrina victims using an artifactual field experiment. In this experiment, respondents from the general population viewed a short audiovisual presentation that manipulated respondents' perceptions of the income, race, and deservingness of Katrina victims in one of two small cities. Respondents then decided how to split $100 between themselves and a charity helping Katrina victims in this small city. We also collected survey data on subjective support for government spending to help the Katrina victims in the cities. We find, first, that our income manipulation had a significant effect on giving; respondents gave more when they perceived the victims to be poorer. Second, the race and deservingness manipulations had virtually no effect on average giving. Third, the averages mask substantial racial bias among sub-groups of our sample. For instance, the subgroup of whites who identify with their ethnic or racial group strongly biased their giving against blacks. Finally, subjective support for government spending to help Katrina victims was significantly influenced by both our race and deservingness manipulations, but not by the income manipulation. White respondents supported significantly less public spending for black victims and significantly more for victims who were described in more flattering terms, such as being helpful and law-abiding.
Notes: "July 2007."

Includes bibliographical references (p. 38-40).

Also available in PDF from the NBER World Wide Web site (www.nber.org).