EXAMINATION OF GAVAGE TUBE PLACEMENT (FEEDING TUBE, PEDIATRICS).
Contributors: Indiana University School of Nursing.
Published: 1996
Number of pages: 257
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery.
Description: The hospital records of 201 children having both an enteral tube and at least one radiograph showing tube placement were examined retrospectively for risk factors and signs/symptoms of tube placement error. The probability of a placement error was 15.9% (32/201) the day of entry into the study and 13.8% (53/385) over all radiograph days. Forty-two of the 201 children (20.9%) had a placement error occur at least once. Activity level was the only risk factor significantly related to radiographic tube placement $\rm (p<0.025)$ with active children having more placement errors.

In addition, 47 tubes in 40 children were observed prospectively over a total of 329 days. At entry (day 1) enteral tube placement was checked both radiographically and by blinded nursing assessment using the bedside placement-checking methods which included detecting bubbles, auscultating sounds, and testing pH of aspirate. The probability of placement error was 30.4% (14/46) the day of entry into the study and 21.8% (22/101) over all radiograph follow-up days. Nineteen of the 47 tubes (40.4%) had a placement error occur at least once.

On the day of entry into the study, level of consciousness $\rm (p < 0.000)$ and swallowing problems $\rm (p < 0.012)$ were significantly related to radiographic tube placement. Over all observation days, level of consciousness $\rm (p<0.000),$ swallowing problems $\rm (p<0.008),$ and activity level $\rm (p<0.003)$ were significantly related to radiographic placement. Inactive, semicomatose/comatose children with swallowing problems were more likely to have tube placement errors. Altered levels of consciousness and swallowing problems had been identified previously in the adult literature as risk factors for tube placement errors.

When bedside placement was compared to radiographic placement, the sensitivity of the nurse's assessment of tube placement was 64.6%, false negative rate was 35.4%, specificity was 27.3%, and false positive rate was 72.7% indicating an experienced nurse failed to detect a tube placement error $>$35% of the time using the bedside placement-checking methods. Radiographic verification of enteral tube placement on insertion is warranted.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-07, Section: B, page: 4295.

Thesis (PH.D.)--INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING, 1996.

School code: 0815.