Pluralism and liberal politics
By: Robert B. Talisse
Publisher: Routledge
Published: 2012
Place of publication: New York
Language: eng
Number of pages: 177
ISBN-13: 9780415884211
Subjects: Cultural pluralism; Political science; Pragmatism; Political aspects; Philosophy; Liberalism
Description: In this book, Robert Talisse critically examines the moral and political implications of pluralism, the view that our best moral thinking is indeterminate and that moral conflict is an inescapable feature of the human condition. Through a careful engagement with the work of William James, Isaiah Berlin, John Rawls, and their contemporary followers, Talisse distinguishes two broad types of moral pluralism: metaphysical and epistemic. After arguing that metaphysical pluralism does not offer a compelling account of value and thus cannot ground a viable conception of liberal politics, Talisse proposes and defends a distinctive variety of epistemic pluralism. According to this view, certain value conflicts are at present undecidable rather than intrinsic. Consequently, epistemic pluralism countenances the possibility that further argumentation, enhanced reflection, or the acquisition of more information could yield rational resolutions to the kinds of value conflicts that metaphysical pluralists deem irresolvable as such. Talisse's epistemic pluralism hence prescribes a politics in which deep value conflicts are to be addressed by ongoing argumentation and free engagement among citizens; the epistemic pluralist thus sees liberal democracy is the proper political response to ongoing moral disagreement.
Notes: Includes bibliographical references (p. [157]-172) and index.
Table of contents: title: Introduction: pluralism and political theory; title: Two metaphysical pluralists: Berlin and James; title: Classical pragmatism and pluralism; title: From pluralism to politics: four neo-Berlinian proposals; title: Value pluralism as an account of value; title: Towards a new pragmatist political theory; title: Can (political) liberals take their own side in an argument?; title: Religion and politics.