DIAGNOSTIC CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT: CONTENT VALIDATION OF NORTH AMERICAN NURSING DIAGNOSES IN JAPAN.
Contributors: Boston College.
Published: 1996
Number of pages: 212
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.; Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies.; Health Sciences, Health Care Management.
Description: This descriptive study examined the content validity of the 12 North American nursing diagnoses in Japan, and compared differences in the critical characteristics across nurse's practice areas, over patient age groups, and by nurses' diagnostic concept familiarity. Distribution of a survey to a convenience sample of 3700 yielded 1908 usable data. Based on Fehring's diagnostic content validation model, subjects rated each defining characteristic on a 5-point scale. The criterion for a critical characteristic was modified in this study from 0.80 to 0.70. Twelve diagnoses included were four Self Care Deficit diagnoses (Bathing/Hygiene, Dressing/Grooming, Toileting, and Feeding), Anxiety, Knowledge Deficit, Ineffective Individual Coping, Hopelessness, Sleep Pattern Disturbance, Pain, Impaired Skin Integrity, and High Risk for Infection.

Thirty-four critical characteristics which were similar to the findings in American studies for the 10 diagnoses were identified from the analysis of the subsample of nurse experts (n = 214). For Ineffective Individual Coping and Hopelessness, no characteristics were identified as critical. Using another subsample of nurses (n = 886) who used nursing diagnosis at least one year, critical characteristics were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and/or the Mann-Whitney U test across practice areas, over patient age groups, and by diagnostic concept familiarity. Findings included: (1) the number and content of the critical characteristics were influenced by the three variables, (2) there were characteristics which did not differ statistically across both practice areas and age groups, (3) mean validity ratings of characteristics were significantly higher when nurses were familiar with the diagnostic concept.

The findings suggested the following: (1) three to four critical characteristics per diagnosis identified are clinically useful for making an accurate diagnosis, (2) stable and cross-culturally common critical characteristics of a diagnostic concept may exist as well as context-specific or culture-specific characteristics, and (3) clinical experience with the given diagnostic concept under study should be considered when selecting nurse experts for content validation. Further analyses and replications were recommended.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-10, Section: B, page: 6181.

Thesis (PH.D.)--BOSTON COLLEGE, 1996.

School code: 0016.