Fertilizer responses of volunteer longleaf pine trees within a loblolly pine plantation
Subtitle: separating direct effects from competition effects
By: Peter H. Anderson and Kurt H. Johnsen
Contributors: Johnsen, Kurt H. (Kurt Henry), 1959-; United States. Forest Service. Southern Research Station
Series: Research paper SRS -- 48; Research paper SRS -- 48.
Publisher: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station
Published: 2009
Place of publication: Asheville, NC
Language: eng
Format: [electronic resource] :
Subjects: Longleaf pine; Fertilizers; Loblolly pine; Forest soils; Fertilization; Plant competition; Tree farms
Description: Evidence is mixed on how well longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) responds to increased soil nitrogen via fertilization. We examined growth and physiological responses of volunteer longleaf pine trees within an intensive loblolly pine (P. taeda L.) fertilization experiment. Fertilizer was applied annually following thinning at age 8 years (late 1992) at rates tailored to maintain a high needle nitrogen concentration. We measured the annual growth of 20 volunteer longleaf pine trees per treatment. We took bimonthly gas exchange measures on 12 longleaf pine trees per treatment from June 1999 through June 2000, after which we estimated carbon isotope discrimination and foliar nitrogen concentration on foliage. The impact of fertilization in both growth and gas exchange was dependent on competition for light with neighboring loblolly pine trees. When fertilized longleaf pine trees were separated into categories with respect to being dominant or suppressed (relative to the loblolly pine trees) dominant-fertilized trees had the lowest carbon isotope discrimination, increased photosynthesis, and decreased stomatal conductance, indicating greater water use efficiency in these trees. Compared to loblolly pine, longleaf pine growth is restricted less by poor soil nutrition. However, early rotation longleaf pine appears to have the potential to increase growth rate via fertilization to almost the same extent as loblolly pine.
Notes: Title from PDF cover (viewed Sept. 8, 2011).

"December 2009"--P. [2] of PDF cover.

Includes bibliographical references (p. 5-6).