The United States Supreme Court
By: edited by Paul McCaffrey and Lynn M. Messina.
Contributors: McCaffrey, Paul, 1977-; Messina, Lynn.
Series: The reference shelf  ;; v. 77, no. 5
Publisher: H. W. Wilson
Published: 2005
Place of publication: Bronx, N.Y
Language: eng
Subjects: United States. Supreme Court; United States. Supreme Court -- History; Courts of last resort -- United States; Constitutional history -- United States
Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index.
Table of contents: title: "About the Supreme Court," www.supremecourtus.gov; title: "A history of the Supreme Court," from FindLaw, 2005; title: "The Supreme Court in the nineteenth century," by William H. Rehnquist, Journal of   Supreme Court History, 2002; title: "The once and future Supreme Court," by David J. Garrow, American History, February 2005; title: "Blackmun papers highlight importance of a single justice," USA Today, March 16, 2004; title: "High court ethereality," by Dahlia Lithwick, The American Lawyer, Feb. 11, 2005; title: "The trial of a young nation," by Charles F. Hobson, Humanities, Jan./Feb. 2003; title: "It could have gone the other way," by Michael J. Klarman, The Nation, May 3, 2004; title: "40 years and waiting : despite great strides, promise of Gideon's victory yet to be realized," by Marshall J. Hartman, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, April 26, 2003; title: "Police tactic to sidestep Miranda rights rejected," by Jerry Markon, The Washington Post, June 29, 2004; title: "Both sides on abortion wary of Supreme Court-Roe v. Wade : 30 years later," by Jan Crawford Greenburg, Chicago Tribune, Jan. 21, 2003; title: "A long shadow," by Debra Rosenberg, Newsweek, Nov. 8, 2004; title: "Are landmark court decisions all that important?" by Michael Klarman, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Aug. 8, 2003; title: "Controversy continues over the pledge of allegiance," by Martha M. McCarthy, Educational Horizons, Winter 2005; title: "Gay rights groups hail landmark decision in Texas case," by Chuck Lindell, Austin American-Statesman, June 27, 2003; title: "Court upholds use of race in admissions," by James M. O'Neill, The Philadelphia Inquirer, June 24, 2003; title: "Taking it to the trenches," by Philip Carter, Slate, June 29, 2004; title: "A victory for vouchers," by Jodie Morse, Time, July 8, 2002; title: "Justices to rule on abortion for minors," by David G. Savage, Los Angeles Times, May 24, 2005; title: "Justices reinstate suits on Internet file sharing," by Linda Greenhouse and Lorne Manly, The New York Times, June 28, 2005; title: "The Rehnquist difference," by Alan J. Borsuk, Milwawkee Journal Sentinel, June 27, 2004; title: "Rehnquist the great?" by Jeffrey Rosen, The Atlantic Monthly, April 2005; title: "Reviewing Rehnquist," by Richard Brust, ABA Journal, May 2003; title: "Long Term," by Linda Greenhouse, The New York Times, March 16, 2003; title: "Sandra's Day," by Ramesh Ponnuru, National Review, June 30, 2003; title: "What the New Court Will Look Like," by Lorraine Woellert, BusinessWeek, Nov. 22, 2004; title: "How to judge," by Jeffrey Rosen, The New Republic, Nov. 29-Dec. 6, 2004; title: "One scenario : Chief Justice Scalia?" by Warren Richey, The Christian Science Monitor, May 13, 2005; title: "Picking judges a disorderly affair," by Charlie Savage, The Boston Globe, May 8, 2005; title: "The coming firestorm," The Economist, Jan. 1, 2005; title: "Court intrigue Is just looking for an opening," USA Today, March 1, 2005; title: "Justices' summer travel has new significance as court increasingly invokes rulings of foreign courts," by Tony Mauro, Broward Daily Business Review, July 8, 2003.