On the general relativity of fiscal language
By: Laurence J.Kotlikoff, Jerry Green.
Contributors: Green, Jerry R.; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Series: NBER working paper series -- no. 12344.; Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research) -- working paper no. 12344.
Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research
Published: 2006
Place of publication: Cambridge, Mass
Language: eng
Number of pages: 12
Subjects: Economics -- Language -- Mathematical models
Description: "A century ago, everyone thought time and distance were well defined physical concepts.  But neither proved absolute.  Instead, measures/reports of time and distance were found to depend on one's reference point, specifically one's direction and speed of travel, making our apparent physical reality, in Einstein's words, "merely an illusion."Like time and distance, standard fiscal measures, including deficits, taxes, and transfer payments, depend on one's reference point/reporting procedure/language/labels.  As such, they too represent numbers in search of concepts that provide the illusion of meaning where none exists.This paper, dedicated to our dear friend, David Bradford, provides a general proof that standard and routinely used fiscal measures, including the deficit, taxes, and transfer payments, are economically ill-defined.  Instead these measures reflect the arbitrary labeling of underlying fiscal conditions.  Analyses based on these and derivative measures, such as disposable income, private assets, and personal saving, represent exercises in linguistics, not economics"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Notes: "June 2006."

Includes bibliographical references.

Also available in PDF from the NBER world wide web site (www.nber.org).