Geosynthetic reinforced soil for low volume bridge abutments
By: David J. White ... [et al.]
Contributors: Iowa State University. Center for Earthworks Engineering Research; Iowa. Highway Research Board; Iowa. Department of Transportation
Publisher: Center for Earthworks Engineering Research, Iowa State University
Published: 2012
Place of publication: Ames, IA
Language: eng
Number of pages: 115
Subjects: Bridges; Abutments; Testing; Reinforced soils; Geosynthetics; Bridge abutments
Description: This report presents a review of literature on geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments, and test results and analysis from two field demonstration projects (Bridge 1 and Bridge 2) conducted in Buchanan County, Iowa, to evaluate the feasibility and cost effectiveness of the use of GRS bridge abutments on low volume roads (LVRs). The two projects included GRS abutment substructure and railroad flat car (RRFC) bridge superstructure. The construction costs varied from $43k to $49k, which was about 50 to 60% lower than the expected costs for building a conventional bridge. Settlement monitoring at both bridges indicated maximum settlements less than 1 in. during the monitoring phase. Laboratory testing on GRS fill material, field testing, and in ground instrumentation, abutment settlement monitoring, and bridge live load (LL) testing were conducted on Bridge 2. Laboratory testing on aggregate fill with and without geosynthetic material showed improvements in shear strength parameters and permanent deformation behavior when reinforced with geosynthetic due to lateral restraint effect at the soil-geosynthetic interface. Bridge LL testing under static loads indicated maximum deflections close to 0.9 in and non-uniform deflections transversely across the bridge due to poor load transfer between RRFCs. The ratio of horizontal to vertical stresses in the GRS fill was lo3 (less than 0.25), indicating low lateral stress on the soil surrounding GRS fill material. Bearing capacity analysis at Bridge 2 indicated lower than recommended factor of safety (FS) values due to low ultimate reinforcement strength of the geosynthetic material used in this study and relatively weak underlying foundation layer. Global stability analysis of the GRS abutment structure revealed lower FS than recommended against sliding failure along the interface of the GRS fill material and the underlying weak foundation layer. Design and construction recommendations to help improve the stability and performance of the GRS abutment structures on future projects are provided in this report.
Notes: "January 2012."

Includes bibliographical references (p. 110-113).

Final report.

Also available via the Internet.

Sponsored by the Iowa Highway Research Board and the Iowa Dept. of Transportation IHRB project TR-621 InTrans project 10-380