"WORTH WAITING FOR": AN ANALYSIS OF A MIDWIFERY MODEL OF CARE IN A LOW-INCOME CULTURALLY DIVERSE COMMUNITY (HEALTH CARE).
Contributors: Florence Heller Graduate School for Advanced Studies in Social Welfare.
Published: 1991
Number of pages: 243
Subjects: Health Sciences, Public Health.; Health Sciences, Nursing.; Sociology, Public and Social Welfare.
Description: This is a study of a midwifery model of care in a municipal hospital of a large metropolitan community. The hospital serves a community which is 31% Hispanic, 34% Black and 32% White, 3% other racial groups. More than 56% of the hospital discharges are funded by Medicaid. The mothers who choose this hospital for service are 51% Hispanic, 32% Black, 13.5% White, 3% other racial and ethnic entities. The infant outcome statistics from the hospital are better than would be expected given the ethnic, racial and socio-economic profile of the community.

Case study methods of observation and interviewing are used to describe the midwifery model of care as it is conceptualized in theory and as it is practiced by the midwifery staff in the provision of prenatal care. The findings of this study indicate that the essential components of care in the midwifery model include: affective support, education and counseling and to a lesser degree decisional control.

Seven hundred and eighty-three mothers and seven hundred ninety-four infants are included in a statistical analysis of maternal and infant outcome. The study is designed to answer the following research question: What is the relationship between different models of prenatal care and selected measures of maternal and infant outcome?.

In the first step of the analysis, descriptive statistics are used to examine the relationship between the three models of care and demographic and other characteristics of the sample. In the second step of the analysis, a regression equation is developed to examine the relative effects of selected prenatal/labor/delivery factors and birthweight.

This study finds a number of statistically significant outcomes among the three groups, however differences are more dramatic when the N.C.B. and other groups are pooled and the comparison is between "Care" and "No Care". In the regression analysis, major complications carry the most weight as a predictor of birthweight, however, no prenatal care is also a variable with statistical significance. Although prenatal care at N.C.B. is associated with an increase of 94 grams in an infant's weight, it is statistically significant only at the $<$.10 level. (Abstract shortened with permission of author.).
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-08, Section: B, page: 4151.

Thesis (PH.D.)--BRANDEIS U., THE F. HELLER GRAD. SCH. FOR ADV. STUD. IN SOC. WEL., 1991.

School code: 0541.