Which one does not belong?  Perceptual biases and evaluative reasoning in the development of racial attitudes.
Published: 2004
Language: eng
Number of pages: 125
Description: The development of racial bias in children has been studied for over a century; two main theoretical approaches have emerged. Psychologically oriented theorists use perceptual processes to explain why race is an important category to young children. Evolutionary theorists, on the other hand, argue that perceptual processes cannot explain children's well-developed theory of race, or why in some cases, race is not important. Instead, evolutionary theorists turn to domain-specific processing mechanisms. Hirschfeld (1996) argued that such mechanisms are invoked in evaluative reasoning about human kinds and that they operate in a way that encourages a race focus. Furthermore, he suggested that evaluative reasoning about race is distinct from perceptual knowledge, in young children. In this study, the Category Salience and Evaluation Task (CSET) was designed to test competing predictions in light of these approaches regarding the development of racial attitudes in 3- to 6-year-olds. This task separates perceptual and evaluative judgements of race. Findings were that children focused on gender and age over race on the more perceptually driven portion of the CSET. However, when evaluative reasoning was induced by asking children to make good/bad judgments, children focused more heavily on race, supporting the idea that perceptual and evaluative modes of reasoning are distinct, and suggested that judgements about race are value-laden from an early age.
Notes: Adviser:  Philip D. Zelazo.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Toronto, 2004.

Electronic version licensed for access by U. of T. users.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-03, page: 0998.

MICR copy on microfiche (2 microfiches).