INDEPENDENT, INTERDEPENDENT, DEPENDENT, AND NON-NURSING ACTIONS AND JUDGMENTS CONCERNING THE CARE OF ADULT COMATOSE PATIENTS IN A SHOCK-TRAUMA UNIT (HEAD INJURY, NEUROLOGICAL NURSING, NEURO TRAUMA).
Contributors: Catholic University of America.
Published: 1986
Number of pages: 179
Subjects: Health Sciences, Nursing.
Description: The purpose was fourfold: (a) identify essential aspects of care of the adult comatose patient with cranio-cerebral trauma; (b) determine if registered nurses' performance (action) and judgment of those essential aspects are independent, interdependent, dependent, or non-nursing; (c) explore selected rationales which influence the performance (action) and judgment of these nurses; and (d) determine if a difference exists between performance (action) and judgment of aspects of care as independent, interdependent, dependent, or non-nursing activities.

The investigator developed instrument, Essentials of Care for the Adult Comatose Patient with Craniocerebral Trauma was developed through a review of neurological/neurosurgical literature. After validation, the instrument contained 171 aspects of care divided into nine categories.

Data were collected using this instrument in a shock-trauma center affiliated with an Institute of Emergency Medical Services System. The convenience sample was comprised of 73 registered nurses.

To determine if registered nurses performed and judged the essentials of care as independent, interdependent, dependent or non-nursing, a criterion of (GREATERTHEQ)90% agreement among the subjects for each aspect of care in action and judgment was established. Rationales which influenced actions and judgments were education, physician's orders, nursing orders, unit policy, and individual competency. The mean percentage for all nurses was obtained for each rationale influencing independent, interdependent, dependent, and non-nursing actions and judgments by categories. To determine if a difference existed between care that nurses were giving (action) and nurses' judgment of the aspect of care as independent, paired t-tests were performed to determine significant differences between the mean percentage of actions and judgments for each category.

Findings indicate that 70 aspects of care were identified as independent nursing actions and judgments. Major rationales which influenced actions and judgments were education, unit policy, and physician's orders. Significant differences existed between independent performance and judgment of aspects of care in three categories: assessment, general nursing care, and nutrition.

The 171 aspects of care constitute criteria for the care of the comatose patient. The study contributes to the definition of nursing by identifying 70 independent aspects of care for this patient population.
Notes: Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 47-09, Section: B, page: 3709.

Thesis (D.N.SC.)--THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA, 1986.

School code: 0043.