code-cracker/code-cracker — pull request #135 by dmgandini (2014-12-05 01:32:28+00:00)
Title: Call extension method as an extension #27 (Second Time)

I named the analyser and the fix provider and the test with suffix CallExtensionMethodAsExtension.

In the tests I've tried to cover the following scenarios:

* An method extension. (No warn case)
* An static call, in order to trigger a fix
* A static call with no parameter
* A static call with a parameter
* A static call without parameter and a full namespace declared.
Because this is my first contribution in an open source project, please, let me know what I need to do if any improvement on that code is necessary

Thanks

PS: It is regarding https://github.com/code-cracker/code-cracker/pull/103 PR. I did something really wrong in my merge, thus I'm sending a new/fresh pull request