Nedomas/zapata — pull request #6 by edgibbs (2014-12-02 16:57:43+00:00)
Title: Updating configuration to show coverage for production code in Coveralls...

Wondered why the Coveralls report showed test coverage for spec files, and then noticed that Coveralls isn't required before 'zapata' is required so it doesn't get included in coverage. I ran simplecov with it's configuration and zapata required afterwards and got the expected report with coverage of all the production classes.

Enjoying the gem so far.