code-cracker/code-cracker — pull request #103 by dmgandini (2014-12-02 01:47:14+00:00)
Title: Call extension method as an extension #27

I named the analyser and the fix provider and the test with suffix CallExtensionMethodAsExtension.

In the tests I've tried to cover the following scenarios:
* An method extension. (No warn case)
* An static call, in order to trigger a fix
* A static call with no parameter
* A static call with a parameter
* A static call without parameter and a full namespace declared.

Because this is my first contribution in an open source project, please, let me know what I need to do if any improvement on that code is necessary

Thanks